Sarah Katz, 21, had a heart condition and died hours after she drank Panera’s Charged Lemonade, a large cup of which contains more caffeine than Red Bull and Monster energy drinks combined.

All Panera Bread restaurants are now displaying “enhanced” disclosures about the restaurant chain’s highly caffeinated lemonade, a spokesperson said Saturday, following a lawsuit that was filed by the family of a young woman who died after drinking the beverage.

Monday’s lawsuit, which was first obtained by NBC News, alleges that Sarah Katz, an Ivy League student with a heart condition, died after she drank Panera’s Charged Lemonade last year.

A large Charged Lemonade contains 390 milligrams — nearly the 400-milligram daily maximum of caffeine that the Food and Drug Administration says healthy adults can safely consume.

  • squiblet@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s very unfortunate what happened to this girl. I don’t understand though how having a serious heart condition, she didn’t read the sign that said “as much caffeine as coffee” or “guarana and green coffee”. I have a few food related conditions and I read or research absolutely everything I consume at a restaurant.

    • bioemerl@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      I read or research absolutely everything I consume at a restaurant

      Generally if this is your standard people will die

      • squiblet@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s a reasonable standard for someone who has a rare heart condition and can’t drink caffeine. People without heart conditions are not going to die from this lemonade.

        • bioemerl@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          You are suggesting people who have a rare air condition to spend their whole life in constant fear every single thing the eater drink having caffeine in it and it’ll eventually kill them.

          It’s just not sustainable and not reasonable, it’s so easy to just put a big bold warning label when things have caffeine when you wouldn’t expect it.

          • squiblet@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            It WAS labeled with the phrase “contains as much caffeine as our coffee” and “caffeine from guarana and green coffee”. And yes, I do expect people with a rare condition that might kill them to be wary of caffeine. I’m allergic to tree nuts. Therefore I make sure everything I consume does not have tree nuts. I have celiac disease, so I make sure everything I consume does not contain gluten. I have T1, and learn the carb amounts for everything I consume beforehand. I don’t expect every product to have a warning label for the 1% of people who have those conditions.

            • Brekky@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              The last time this was posted there was examples of some shops missing the labels. I don’t think if it was ever confirmed if the shop the woman visited was displaying the label or not.

              • iopq@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                1 year ago

                Even if there are warning signs, doesn’t mean everyone will read them, even people with heart conditions

                • bioemerl@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That’s true, but you can eliminate like 90 percent of the risk with appropriate AND VERY BOLD labeling

              • SheeEttin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                1 year ago

                The only way to get it to zero is by eliminating caffeine entirely. Not just from this, but from energy drinks, coffee, and so on. Because there will always be someone who ignores any warnings and has something they shouldn’t.

                • bioemerl@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yeah, but there’s a fine line between someone drinking an energy drink and someone drinking lemonade.

                  The problem here is that it isn’t directly and obviously intuitive that lemonade has tons of caffeine. It should be.

    • snooggums@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      If it was clearly labeled she would have been able to make that choice and there wouldn’t have been a court decision that it wasn’t labeled well enough.

          • squiblet@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            If it wasn’t, we’ll probably find out in the lawsuit. not sure what your ‘lol’ is about because you can’t say with anymore certainty it was not labeled than someone can assert that it was. As show in other articles, the sign with the name of the drink included the description of the caffeine content. It seems unlikely that it didn’t have a name label on the drink dispenser, but sure, it’s possible and if so, that is negligent of them. Unlimited Sip Club also isn’t a good idea for this drink.

            As far as me and a ‘plot arc easier for you to live with’: what are you talking about? Do you think I am Panera or something and I’m wracked with guilt? Seems like an unnecessary analysis of what you think about my personality for some unknown reason.