As more and more states pass laws targeting “pornographic material” in books and online, they are repeatedly running up against a problem: The Bible has not just a few passages that could be considered indecent

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The Davis School District initially removed the Bible from school libraries after a review determined it did include “vulgar” content. But the school board unanimously reversed its decision after a review by an appeal committee determined the text has " significant, serious value for minors which outweighs the violent or vulgar content it contains," the AP reported.

    There’s no hypocrisy here.

  • MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The Davis School District initially removed the Bible from school libraries after a review determined it did include “vulgar” content. But the school board unanimously reversed its decision after a review by an appeal committee determined the text has " significant, serious value for minors which outweighs the violent or vulgar content it contains," the AP reported.

    Now to challenge the “significant, serious” value. Truth before law is based on facts, right?