Not sure if this is the correct place to post, but I just wanna kinda rant a bit.

I’m not the only one that hates this, right?

An app can just do a “This App Does Not Allow Screenshots”? Like… wtf?

Like, its my phone, and some app can just decide to disable a fuction of my phone. It’s my phone and if I wanna take a screenshot, I’m taking a screenshot. I don’t care about whatever “security” the app developer wants.

Imagine if every online shopping app whether fast food or amazon, just used this to block you from taking a screenshot so you can’t save the records in case of a dispute.

Which android developer thought it was a good idea to let an app disable a function on your phone. Even iPhone doesn’t have this stupid concept.

Sorry for the rant.

Anyone wanna share your stories?

(P.S. I have a cheap secondary phone to take photos of the screen. “This App Does Not Allow Screenshots” my ass lmao, I’m taking the screenshot whether the app wants it or not.

  • Bezier@suppo.fi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The point of many of android’s “protection” features isn’t to protect the user from apps, but to protect apps from the user. I hate it.

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      7 hours ago

      In this case, I think it’s protecting apps from other apps. No secret screen recording going on while you’re looking at bank statements, etc. I find that annoying, too, but I’m less annoyed by the reasoning in this case.

      Now if Google could explain why toggling wifi through Tasker requires root, I would LOVE to hear the reasoning…

      • Jiří Král@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        In this case, I think it’s protecting apps from other apps. No secret screen recording going on while you’re looking at bank statements, etc.

        I think with all the engineers at Google developing Android they could come up with a solution of how to discern whether the act of screenshot was triggered solely by the user, or an app on the phone. They are the ones in power of all the APIs that allow other apps to capture the screen content in the first place. Maybe I am simplifying it too much, but this seems as a bad excuse to me.

        Maybe it would be too hard of a solution since there’s so many ways third party apps could capture screen content (including for example the Android accessibility service which also allows apps to read content of the screen and even simulate screen touches and gestures which many automation apps make use of) that blocking the screenshot alltogether is by far the most feasible solution.

        • glimse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          For me and my family, I think the best solution would be to leave it as-is but with a way to lift the restrictions for power users that doesn’t involve root access. Something akin to enabling developer mode without having to buy a specific rootable phone

        • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          There is already a solution:

          Third-party apps, unless a user specifically go to settings and find that option, don’t have the permission known as “Draw Over Top” that’s required to do screen recordings/screenshots.

          So by default, a user is already safe from a malicious app trying to steal info. (That is, unless they just be an idiot and give the app “Draw Over Top” permission)

            • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Well you are gonna be trusting the password manager anyways, since its literally storing all your passwords. If you trust Bitwarden to store all your passwords, then you can trust it to not abuse the “Draw Over Top” permission.

        • glimse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          The first two don’t bug me but dam, give me my 6 buttons back!! I hate these fat notification tray icons. And yes, fuck Google for making it take MORE clicks to toggle wifi/cellular than before.

          • Spectrism@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Unless they changed something in Android 15, which I haven’t been able to try yet, I don’t think the separate WiFi / Mobile Data tiles were ever removed. At least they still exist on LineageOS 21 (Android 14), just hidden in the tile editor. You might want to check if you still have them there.

      • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        They changed it the other day where airplane mode doesn’t require root. That one’s nice for me.

        Never mind that shortcuts on iOS has been able to do that simple task from its inception.

      • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Third-party apps, unless a user specifically go to settings and find that option, don’t have the permission known as “Draw Over Top” that’s required to do screen recordings/screenshots.

        • glimse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Fair enough, though experience with my unsavvy family makes me think a lot of people will do whatever an app tells them to do

      • dingus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Ok but why is my browser doing this in incognito mode? Incognito mode isn’t a banking app. It’s me not wanting my browser to save my Facebook login info or history.

        • kn33@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          The target use case for incognito mode is to prevent the device from saving your activity during the browsing session through things like cookies and history. To that end, incognito also blocks it to prevent other apps from saving your activity through screen recordings or screenshots.

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Being able to block screenshots is “supposed” to protect users from having malware take screenshots of banking apps and other such information.

      If app developers were good, this could have been a good feature.

      But I agree with OP. It still should be the user’s choice.

      • Klajan@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        My Banking App does have the option to disable this feature.

        It’s all fine if it’s a user choice, very annoying if it’s not.

    • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 hours ago

      “Protections” are fine, as long as there’s an override for it.

      User doesn’t like potential malware from “sideloading”? Then don’t enable “Install from Unknown Sources”.

      Same thing with everything else, there should be an override switch.