• surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It’s not exponentially growing. At best, the growth rate has exponentially increased. These are VERY different things.

    It was exponentially growing, the platform would come screeching to a halt and crash.

    • korendian@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Jesus fucking Christ, you people are miserably pedantic. Nothing about my original post is wrong, so please kindly shut the fuck up with your “well achtually” takes.

      • M137@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Ah, the classic response to being proven wrong on the Internet. Have a hissy fit like a 5-year-old and call everyone pedantic etc. You were objectively wrong but there’s no problem with that, everyone is wrong about stuff all the time, the difference is how you handle that. You either act like a mentally grown person and just go “oh, damn, I didn’t know that, thanks for correcting me” or act like you’ve done. No one is out to say that pixelfed isn’t growing, but you’re misrepresenting facts and then being a fucking child about being told so.

        • korendian@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I’m not calling everyone pedantic. I’m calling you and the other guy who chimed in with pedantic takes pedantic. You can claim you’re right all you want, but nothing about the title of the post “Pixelfed user count has gone vertical” is inaccurate. Whether it’s the user count or the user growth rate that is exponential is irrelevant. Nothing about my post is misrepresenting the fact that on the graph, the number of users is going nearly straight up, exactly as the title describes. Feel free to keep trying to correct me, but I know I’m right because I have eyes and can identify basic shapes. I am very willing to admit when I am wrong, but this is not one of those cases.

        • korendian@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          They seem to be serious. The more concerning thing is that people are agreeing with them. I guess common sense is not so common.

          • Blaze (he/him)@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I got the same criticism about a similar graph a while ago. Numbers are on the left, people can clearly see how big of a change the graph shows, and I have no way to present the graph differently as it’s straight from the website, but people still want to argue about it