His win is a direct result of the Supreme Court’s decision in a pivotal LGBTQ+ rights case.

  • MJKee9@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Sure it does. Notice i said unreasonable harm. There is a clear distinction between refusing to take someone’s wedding photo and providing someone with life saving care.

    There are US Court cases that deal with this distinction.

    Edit: i originally said unnecessarily as opposed to unreasonably… But the point still stands