Summary

In his farewell speech, President Joe Biden warned of a growing “oligarchy” in the U.S., where extreme wealth and power threaten democracy.

Comparing modern elites to 19th-century robber barons, he called for reforms to hold the wealthy accountable, as done in the past.

Biden also criticized a “tech-industrial complex” concentrating power and spreading disinformation, weakening democracy.

His remarks sparked a surge in Google searches for “oligarchy.”

The speech comes amid rising concerns about policies favoring billionaires, like Trump’s tax cuts and potential cuts to social safety programs.

  • novibe@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    1 day ago

    Becoming…? The country founded on the principle that only landowners and capitalists should be represented democratically is becoming an oligarchy?

    • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes, because the early USA did not resemble an modern oligarchy but rather a plutocracy which despite its problems still has greater room for a merit based system than a modern oligarchy provides. We are intentionally concentrating a tremendous amount of wealth in the hands of very few people.

      • novibe@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Plutocracy = rule by the wealthy.

        Oligarchy = rule by the few.

        The wealthy are the few. And with increasing wealth disparity, they are comparatively even fewer than ever before.

        Not really any meaningful difference.

        • aesthelete@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          23 hours ago

          Maybe if we keep going with the concentration of wealth we can boil it all down to just one guy and then drown that guy in the bathtub like Republicans wanted to do with the federal government.

          Ps: As far as your oligarchy vs plutocracy thing goes, we’re just both.

          • novibe@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            I mean give capitalism long enough we might be left with just one guy standing. I do mean guy. An immortal white shriveled dude, alone in a utopia of bots serving him.

            And I just meant this whole “ah we’re not an oligarchy! We’re a plutocracy” thing is just dumb. What is even the difference in these peoples heads? It’s practically the same thing. And it IS the same thing under capitalism. The few who rule are the wealthy.

            That’s the whole point of the system… capitalISM? The owners of CAPITAL rule?

            • aesthelete@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              I mean give capitalism long enough we might be left with just one guy standing. I do mean guy. An immortal white shriveled dude, alone in a utopia of bots serving him.

              Nah, they’re not immortal and all tech has problems. I get this is like the wet dream of the tech bros to be self-sufficient masters of robot armies, and I hate to kink shame, but it won’t ever happen.

    • Amon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      The one directly inspired by Rome, an oligarchy with strict class systems and slavery?