• be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    My first reaction to that final quoted sentence is “well they are callous with human life, why wouldn’t they be with a dog?”

    But my second reaction is, “Don’t they have to account for every on-duty weapon discharge??” You’d think putting “shot dog” as the reason you fired your weapon would be trackable.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      It also implies that the same cop has killed a dog more than once. Which would get you fired in pretty much any other situation. But of course, cops are always immune from that sort of thing.

    • MightEnlightenYou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, they don’t have to account for every discharge, in fact no one in the US has any idea how many times police fire their weapons.