When I was growing up the internet was a place to be liberated from the world say what you want to say, be whoever you want and form genuine communities with shared interests. Now the internet feels like a tool to enslave the mind with identity echo chambers and any deviation leads you to being banned and blocked shunned and silenced within a void that is inescapable. Novel unique websites coded manually by hobbyists running servers for free in the commons allowing people access to the free flow of information under the banner of “information should be free” has largely gone away with corpratisation. I miss the days when the internet was populated largely by nerds aiming to make a better world not this controlled censored hell hole of profiteering.

  • Foresight@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The fact you view politics as a zero sum sports game is the problem in pro or anti, us vs them. You’re mistaken I’m against the practice I just go about it a different way.

    • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can be against abortion and still be pro-choice. No one is pro-abortion. You want to go about it in a way that changes the circumstances in people’s lives so they choose not to have an abortion. So you do think the person’s choice matters. And you can see circumstances for why someone would choose to abort. But note how you don’t want to take actually away their choice, just change the circumstances so they don’t make that choice. That’s because…

      You’re pro-choice.

      • Foresight@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        No I’m against the practice and I don’t believe in the ideology of liberalism I am not pro-choice choice is an illusion presented from the environment.

        • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          You don’t want to institute a ban, but would rather influence people’s choices. That’s pro-choice, dumbass. Anyways you cut it, that’s pro-choice.

          • Foresight@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Influence no, a material solution with a planned economy to serve everyone’s needs in society so everyone has necessities and luxuries to afford and have a happy and healthy life. My solution goes beyond your simple petty plaster over a gaping wound.

            • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Please keep going with that train of thought

              What is your intended outcome of them having a happy and healthy life? Is it so they… choose… not to have abortions?

              • Foresight@lemmy.mlOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                The intended outcome is to develop the economy, develop the productive forces to provide for everyone in a planned economy. And hopefully bring the death rate down caused by capitalism.

                • livus@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Serious question: do you want to ban abortion before you have developed your country’s economy to “provide for everyone”, or after?

                  N.B: 45% of the abortions in the world are unsafe. It is a leading cause of maternal mortality and millions of women are hospitalized each year due to complications of unsafe abortions.

                  • Foresight@lemmy.mlOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I want to provide material abundance so women don’t feel the need to have to have them.

              • Foresight@lemmy.mlOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                That they majority doesn’t need one because people in a planned economy wouldn’t have to the stress of affording a mortgage as housing would be allocated, wouldn’t have to worry about work because jobs would be allocated, wouldn’t have to worry about utility bills because resources would be allocated for need with the change of the economic calculation and wouldn’t worry about inflation causing food prices to fluctuate. Come on it’s not that hard to determine the factors.