• _number8_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 year ago

    i hate how the term ‘loss leader’ is bandied about like i’m meant to feel sorry for them so generously losing money on something when at the end of the night it’s obviously one transaction for everything with a healthy amount of profits baked in

    • zigmus64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      What else should it be called? I don’t think there’s some moral responsibility placed upon the patron to make up for the loss, even with that name. It’s a gamble for the business that is usually thought out and is intended to lead to an increase in profits overall due to margins baked into items that aren’t on promo.

      Sure, it’s considered poor taste to come to a restaurant solely for the free bread and some water and then leave, but it’s completely fair game to take advantage of a loss leading promotion like “endless shrimp” or Costco’s $1.75 for a hot dog and soda. The loss leader gets you in the door. They have other strategies to make that loss worth their while. If you walk in and pound more shrimp than Red Lobster can cover with the margins on the rest of your ticket, that’s their fault not yours… the house lost that bet.

    • FutileRecipe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      like i’m meant to feel sorry for them so generously losing money on something

      But think of the shareholders and CEO. Won’t someone please think of the shareholders and CEO?!

        • labsin@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Belgium. You are not allowed to sell any item at a loss. Fire example Ikea had to increase the prices of its restaurant and a supermarket that did a 3 for 1 promo got in trouble.