Twitch rescinds policy that allowed ‘artistic nudity’ / The decision comes two days after the company said it would allow some sexual content::Twitch has quickly taken back its policy update that gave users permission to post sexual content as long as it was labeled.

  • Fisk400@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    7 months ago

    I think the credit card companies gave them a call and threatened to treat them as a porn site.

      • raptir@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        7 months ago

        There’s plenty of boobs on the internet. It’s this weird thing where people want to see as much as possible of the boobs they can’t see.

        • Billiam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          7 months ago

          Once you see one woman naked… You wanna see the rest of them naked too.

          -Ron “Tater Salad” White

        • WeebLife@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          7 months ago

          One pair of boobs could be different from the other pair of boobs I just looked at, I won’t know until I see them all!

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      7 months ago

      It looks like a company that can’t figure out how it wants to operate anymore… They don’t want to enforce their rules because having soft nudity makes them profit, but they also don’t want to deal with the consequences of actually allowing it…

      • Igloojoe@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        Its simple. Make twitch money without crossing a line. You can skirt the line if you make them tons of money.

  • Lophostemon@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    7 months ago

    Look I’m not a prude or some kinda anti-sex freak but being nekked for others to look at isn’t really ‘artistic’, it’s just about showing yer tits for…uh… titillation. I’m also art school trained so I know how to deconstruct this stuff.

    Sexy-bidness is sexy-bidness. That’s fine. But don’t try to pretend it’s “art”.

    • VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Look I’m not a prude or some kinda anti-sex freak but

      proceeds to rattle off a bunch of prudish anti-sex talking points followed by “trust me, I have a degree” 🤦

      • Lophostemon@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 months ago

        In contemporary Western culture, there’s really no such thing as nudity without a sexual element. All this “beauty of the human form” stuff is an excuse to look at hot bods.

        It’s low-intellect stuff aimed at base instincts. Fine. Whatever.

        I’m old and have kids and not inexperienced in the ole’ rumpy pumpy. My young days of being obsessed with sex are past and I can approach the subject with some detached wisdom rather than being lead around by the whims of my penis.

        I feel sorry for current young people still in that state who are so caught up by all this social media and weird internet shit that they can’t go talk to other human beings in real life and get laid.

        Some advice then; put the fucking games DOWN and go outside and do something in REAL LIFE.

        • Go volunteer to help your community.
        • Go hiking in the mountains.
        • Go do anything except sitting inside and watching Twitch hoping to see bewbs.
        • VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          30
          ·
          7 months ago

          Holy strawmen, Batman! You’ve assembled an entire hay loft of them there, gramps!

          At first I thought you were coming from a place of bias and baseless stereotyping but now I know for a fact that you are.

          Get out of the way and let people younger than your apparent 80 years express themselves how they want to.

          • Womble@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            7 months ago

            Hey now, thats not fair at all.

            There are 80 year old’s who were in their 20s in the summer of love and clearly far less prudish and hung up than the above poster.

            • VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              7 months ago

              True. I was referring to the stereotypical grumpy old man, not any specific octogenarians, many of which are much cooler than you and I will ever be 😁

            • VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              7 months ago

              Yes, I’ve been taken prisoner by the concept that unnecessary censorship is a bad thing. Good deduction, Sherlock. 🙄

              • Lophostemon@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Ah man… I’m not even talking about censorship. I don’t care if Twitch shows tits or not. I’m purely focused on the use of the word ‘art’ to justify looking at naked people. Like… just say you want to look at naked people. Be honest.

                Like there’s all these ‘burlesque’ dance troupes who say their performances are “artistic”. Ok. Do them fully clothed and see how well your audience numbers seem.

                There’s very little intelligent merit in doing x y z naked apart from letting thirsty people have a tingle.

                Whatever. I’m done here. See ya.

    • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      The only age restriction I’ve ever seen on twitch including these last two days was you had to be 13. Did you see anything for age verification when it came to the twitch softcore porn?

      I mean I can see how this would quickly get abused. Maybe a bunch of are either new to the internet or you were hoping to bribe the 16-year-old… And then play stupid and say well the platform allowed it…

  • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 months ago

    Geez, the fuck’s going on over there?

    I don’t think anyone minds artistic nude or even full on porn, assuming there’s reasonable legal protections to keep underage kids away.

    • Grangle1@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      7 months ago

      As we saw in the two days the former policy was in place, there are/were not.

      Also, Twitch is meant to be a gaming-centric streaming platform, not OnlyFans 2.0. There are a million other sites on the internet to find porn, let Twitch be what it’s supposed to be.

      • Beetschnapps@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 months ago

        Thank you! I feel like the plot was getting lost here debating the morality of nudity while ignoring that the site is a gaming streaming service.

        Nudity/porn doesn’t bother me at all but the moment twitch becomes widely associated with it is the beginning of the end. Parents will think twice about allowing kids into the service, brand equity suffers, other services start up that allow for safer spaces and eventually, as you said, twitch risks being considered OF 2.0.

        • mmagod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          good ol’ justin tv lol… i was one of the first few streamers on it… i know that sounds hipster and all, but i miss those days… i got in trouble for streaming family guy and games that didn’t get released yet 😂

  • Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 months ago

    Did anyone really expect this part of the policy to stay? My understanding is that they only reinstated the nudity ban, the rest of the new allowances are still allowed.

    • Ilflish@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I wasn’t even sure if that was the case from the statement, seemed like they revoked the option of cartoon imagery. I expected that may be due to the complications of unrealistic body image associated with suggested age, to be vague enough to avoid an argument in my replies