I would really rather that these were actual examples, and not conspiracy theories. We all have our own unsubstantiated ideas about what shadowy no-gooders are doing, but I’d rather hear about things that are actually happening.

  • snooggums@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    11 months ago

    It is context dependent.

    Owning a car does give you freedom in rural settings where mass transit never existed before it was bought out and run into the ground by automotive companies. They were even fairly cheap for decades if you bought them used!

    But yes, if you live and work somewhere with traffic jams then owning one instead of using and pushing for more mass transit is the opposite of freedom.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah my car gives me the freedom that people in some states and countries have without cars. I keep advocating for that freedom to be universal without cars because I hate having to have one to go out.

    • LetterboxPancake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      Deutsch
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I’m not even in a rural setting and the only way to get my dogs to the vet is via car. Getting a taxi to drive there is difficult when one of your dogs starts vomiting after the second turn.

      That and getting to by family in a rural setting. 2 hours by car vs up to 8 by train. With two dogs. That won’t happen 😐

      Besides that I don’t really need a car.