In September, Elon Musk’s brain-implant company Neuralink announced the much-anticipated news that it would start recruiting volunteers for a clinical trial to test its device. Known as a brain-computer interface, or BCI, it collects electrical activity from neurons and interprets those signals into commands to control an external device. While Musk has said he ultimately wants to merge humans with artificial intelligence, Neuralink’s initial aim is to enable paralyzed people to control a cursor or keyboard with just their thoughts.

Rival efforts to connect people’s brains to computers are also moving forward. This year, Neuralink competitor Synchron demonstrated the long-term safety of its implant in patients. Other startups tested novel devices in human subjects, while new ventures came on the scene.

“It can definitely feel like a breakout year, but in fact it’s the result of decades of work in academia,” says Sumner Norman, a visiting researcher at the California Institute of Technology who’s also the cofounder and CEO of Forest Neurotech, which launched in October. “I think we’re really just starting to feel the effects of that exponential growth.”

The origins of BCIs stretch back to the 1960s and 1970s, when the first ones were tested on lab animals. As researchers began to understand the brain better, these systems evolved to be more sophisticated, allowing paralyzed people to move robotic arms, play video games, and communicate with their minds. Once a largely academic pursuit, BCIs are now of interest to a growing cadre of companies that have emerged since Neuralink’s founding in 2016.

  • Infernal_pizza@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 months ago

    Not just that, imagine having to have invasive brain surgery every few years when it’s time to upgrade, or malware that you literally can’t escape from. Or even just the usual software bugs would be a lot more annoying if it’s physically plugged into your brain

    • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 months ago

      I think the ideal solution will be to have some sort of universal interface and then keep most of the tech on pluggable devices. Though even that will likely mean upgrades to the interface eventually.

      The sad thing is that this type of technology could be a huge boon for people with physical disabilities and even provide some amazing capabilities to non-disabled individuals. But, the advantages will almost certainly be fucked up by greed.

      • Infernal_pizza@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        What about some sort of optical interface? Then we could have all the smart tech in another device and transmit the information wirelessly!

        Jokes aside I agree with the disability side of things, however I still think those would be better as standalone implants that don’t need internet connectivity etc

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      “In order to have 50% fewer ads in your dreams, please subscribe to Neuralink Premium. Only $15.99/month!”

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        No… they drop the adds when you’re awake. They harvest your dreams to source new scripts for reality TV

    • MagicShel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’ll bet the stupidly expensive surgery could be subsidized if we just let them do some light advertising. Maybe just when our eyes are closed so it doesn’t interfere when we need to see.