I often find myself explaining the same things in real life and online, so I recently started writing technical blog posts.

This one is about why it was a mistake to call 1024 bytes a kilobyte. It’s about a 20min read so thank you very much in advance if you find the time to read it.

Feedback is very much welcome. Thank you.

  • Hyperreality@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    However, it’s also possible that they saw it described as a 20 minute read

    Bit of a tangent and anecdotal, but I went back in to higher education a few years ago. I’m middle-aged, I was surrounded by younger people. We’re asked to read an article, everyone starts reading. I read it through, underline the important bits, I’m done reading. I look around. Everyone’s still reading. Oh well, they’ll be done soon. Nope. I think it took most of them 15 minutes to read an article I’d read in under 5. I was a bit perplexed. This is higher education, these aren’t idiots, these are people who should be able to read articles quickly.

    There are plenty of reports of functional literacy decreasing. That children are slower at reading and are less able to understand what they’ve read. Anecdotally, it seems like younger generations really aren’t used to reading longer articles anymore. I grew up reading books as a kid. That’s what we did before phones and the internet. I wonder if younger generations simply don’t have that much experience reading, which is why it takes them so long to read, which is why they read even less.

    In the case of this article, they see 20 minutes, they’re scared off. So they simply guess what was in the article. That’s pretty worrying if that’s what people do. If you’re unable or unwilling to read longer stuff, you’re likely to make ill informed choices or be more easily influenced.

    • The Pantser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      11 months ago

      TLDR: old person went back to school and reads faster than younger people, thinks younger people don’t know how to read quickly.

    • Ook the Librarian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      11 months ago

      I read slowly. It sucks, but it’s not from lack of experience or lack of education. Reading speed seems a weird metric to start wondering if people lack intelligence.

      Being able to read quickly is a valuable skill. I don’t think I could handle jobs like editing, policy making, or lawyering simply because there are not enough hours in the day to make up for my reading deficit.

      Of course, your anecdote is about a group, and mine is about one person. But the sweeping conclusion (if even it isn’t a firm one) on generations irks me. Every generation has its outliers. There will never be a generation without hardworking geniuses in every active field. As far as I know, you are an outlier in your generation, and the comparison simply fails. Maybe peers you knew personally didn’t get the cold judgment of intelligence by reading speed that you are applying to kids you don’t have a relationship with.

      I don’t know. I will never dismiss the importance of reading. But you sound like Lucy here.

      • logicbomb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        I read relatively slowly, but I have the ability to read much faster. I simply like reading more slowly. I have this weird suspicion that people who read very quickly are getting information more quickly, but that they’re either not absorbing it fully, or they’re not enjoying it as much as I do. But that’s obviously a biased perspective.

    • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      they see 20 minutes, they’re scared off

      I’m not “scared off”. I’m on Lemmy to have discussions, not to read articles. If I want to read articles I’ll get a magazine.