Archive https://archive.ph/W6JCV
Every CNN journalist covering Israel and Palestine must submit their work for review by the news organization’s bureau in Jerusalem prior to publication, under a long-standing CNN policy. While CNN says the policy is meant to ensure accuracy in reporting on a polarizing subject, it means that much of the network’s recent coverage of the war in Gaza — and its reverberations around the world — has been shaped by journalists who operate under the shadow of the country’s military censor.
The CNN staff member described how the policy works in practice. “‘War-crime’ and ‘genocide’ are taboo words,” the person said. “Israeli bombings in Gaza will be reported as ‘blasts’ attributed to nobody, until the Israeli military weighs in to either accept or deny responsibility. Quotes and information provided by Israeli army and government officials tend to be approved quickly, while those from Palestinians tend to be heavily scrutinized and slowly processed.”
Is it that common? They do the same when reporting from China or Russia? Get a story approved first by officials and only picking one side of the story?
Reread the article. It didn’t say they are getting approval on stories.
Yes, the news organization’s own desk in Israel.
If the city desk at WaPo picks up a political story, they run it by the politics desk.
If a NYT reporter in NY picks up a story about a royal, does the London office of the NYT not weigh in on the reporting?
They aren’t running it by the Israeli government as the headline suggests. They are running it by themselves. You can fault CNN for legitimate things, and this story is a bunch of innuendo with zero substance. It’s true reporting strung together with buzzwords to sound nefarious. That’s called a hit piece.
Edit: Israel has a government censor. Many countries do. They would say it prevents situations like Brexit or Donald Trump, where a large segment of the domestic population gets tricked by a foreign misinformation campaign.