In an interview with the Guardian from his home base in Burlington, Vermont, Sanders urged the Democratic president to inject more urgency into his bid for re-election. He said that unless the president was more direct in recognising the many crises faced by working-class families his Republican rival would win.

“We’ve got to see the White House move more aggressively on healthcare, on housing, on tax reform, on the high cost of prescription drugs,” Sanders said. “If we can get the president to move in that direction, he will win; if not, he’s going to lose.”

The US senator from Vermont added that he was in contact with the White House pressing that point. “We hope to make clear to the president and his team that they are not going to win this election unless they come up with a progressive agenda that speaks to the needs of the working class of this country.”

Sanders’ warning comes at a critical time in American politics. On Monday, Republicans in Iowa will gather for caucuses that mark the official start of the 2024 presidential election.

Biden faces no serious challenger in the Democratic primaries. But concern is mounting over how he would fare against Trump given a likely rematch between them in November.

  • blazera@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yeah Biden lost me when he outlawed the rail strike (please dont link me to electrical union statement). Frankly its just been downhill from there anyway.

    • DarkGamer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      11 months ago

      Don’t link you evidence that the unions themselves thanked Biden for his help and they got what they wanted without striking?

      • blazera@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        11 months ago

        he outlawed a rail strike and you want to link me a statement from an electrical union that opposed the strike from the beginning and always had sick days. And then I point out how not everyone got any sick days from this, the ones who did didnt get what they would have gotten from a strike, and outlawing strikes poisons any future union bargaining. Im tired of fuckin democrats coming in here to tell me how it was a good thing that the unions didnt get to collective bargain, they dont need any influence on labor because employers and the government have their best interests in mind.

        • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          11 months ago

          Most of us rank and file union members think that he did what he had to do because inflation was already out of control and shutting down the railroads risked tipping the country into recession which would’ve guaranteed a “red wave” election in '22 as well as the reelection of Trump, both of which would be far more dire for working people.

          Local 10 till I die!

          • blazera@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            11 months ago

            damn man union members not even believing in collective bargaining. Yeah, it would have had consequences, that’s why it works. And it historically improves the economy, with increased pay for workers able to spend more into the economy.

          • Adub@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            “Leftist”/Dum-Dum left yet again being the most anti-labor aspects of the Democrat party despite waving union issues around, sadly. They are so fickle and searching for some wild thing to justify quitting & trying to hand the GOP a win at a moments notice. They won’t put the work into listening to great workers like yourself & what it takes to get the job done.

              • Adub@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                The are reasons for strikes and goals behind them. The strike isn’t the thing they are after its a tactic for getting the deals labor wants. You have to follow the whole labor negogation and negogations didn’t end because the strike was. The only hiccup was sick days and many of thd unions got that in the end.

                You are looking for something superfical to be angry about.

      • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        One rich IBEW pencil pusher doesn’t represent every rail worker. You know how we determine the will of that many people? Through voting and they voted against the contract Biden shoved down their throats.

      • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I wonder how much Biden policy is like Reagan policy, just a bunch of young corpo ghouls handing documents to a vaguely pleasant rheumy-eyed old man to sign off on.

        Edit: autocorrect

        • gastationsushi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s hard not to compare their administrations and I wonder if Biden looks back fondly to those days.

          Many DC Dems liked Reagan personally because he was nice to them. At least according to my college polysci lecturer who was in the Senate.