As far as I know, the big damage from Nuclear Weapons planetside is the massive blastwave that can pretty much scour the earth, with radiation and thermal damage bringing up the rear.

But in space there is no atmosphere to create a huge concussive and scouring blast wave, which means a nuclear weapon would have to rely on its all-directional thermal and radiation to do damage… but is that enough to actually be usful as a weapon in space, considering ships in space would be designed to handle radiation and extreme thermals due to the lack of any insulative atmosphere?

I know a lot of this might be supposition based on imaginary future tech and assumptions made about materials science and starship creation, but surely at least some rough guess could be made with regards to a thernonuclear detonation without the focusing effects of an atmosphere?

  • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Chances are there isnt enough air to make a significant difference and any ship large enough to have enough air would have air lock systems as a safety net.

    • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      10 months ago

      Right, but the ship itself would allow the shockwave, metal is still matter for vibrations to follow.

      • Hereforpron2@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        The shock wave needs a medium (air) to travel through. So if the bomb was touching a ship, it would certainly transfer kinetic energy, but if there was any space (not air) between them, there is still no shockwave for the ship to feel.

        • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          10 months ago

          A railgun would be far more effective for transfering kinetic energy and it’s munitions would likely be cheaper

          • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            10 months ago

            How about a railgun with a nuclear payload? Breach the hull and the nuke would work again

            • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              With a hull breach the atmosphere within leaks out and I doubt there would be enough oxygen in the ship to really help with detonation. Maybe some self sealing projectile with a nuclear tip but really any traditional explosive would work fine in that case as the ship would act as a sealed canister

              • Fubber Nuckin'@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                10 months ago

                I think you overestimate how fast the atmosphere would leak out, or underestimate how fast a nuclear blast goes off. You could detonate the nuke before air really has a chance to start leaving behind the wake of the projectile moving at Mach 12 or whatever. The hole left behind i don’t think would change how the explosion worked inside the ship.

              • Ashy@lemmy.wtf
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                I doubt there would be enough oxygen in the ship to really help with detonation.

                How would oxygen help with a nuclear detonation?

        • ZephrC@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          A shockwave can travel along the solid structure itself as the medium. Any ship that is actually directly hit would be vaporized. It’s just the whole point of nuke is not needing a direct hit. I doubt any realistic space vessel with anything even remotely similar to plausible near future technology could survive a direct hit from even a moderately sized conventional explosive.

          • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Yeah, it takes incredible amounts of energy just to move unarmored ships slowly around our own solar system.

            Seems like adding armor would make them so heavy and slow that they wouldn’t be worth using.

            • rambaroo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              Yeah that’s why any reasonable hard sci-fi has to rely on highly advanced fusion or speculative energy technologies

      • piecat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        That would have to be a big ship to feel a shock wave without being consumed by the ball of plasma

        • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Where would that come from? According to a posted article in this thread thermal energy can’t transfer either unless by direct connection and radiation would be the biggest factor, with increasing size compared to on the surface due to lack of atmosphere “attenuating” the distance it travels.