spoiler

Why did Vinny lie to the judge about his [in]experience as a lawyer?

  • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    The case was too important to be handled by someone so inexperienced. The judge could have decided Vinny was unfit or the jurisdiction may not have even allowed such a newbie to handle a murder case

    • 58008@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ahh, I didn’t realise a judge could veto a lawyer like that. I assumed it was the defendant’s prerogative if they wanted a shit lawyer. I mean, if they can choose to defend themselves surely it’s less problematic to hire a qualified-but-new lawyer. Unless that “defending oneself” thing is also something that can be vetoed?

      My knowledge of lawyering is drawn almost entirely from films 🤣

      Cheers mate!

      • redhorsejacket@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fwiw, in the US, you do have a right to represent yourself in court proceedings, but, in order to exercise that right, the judge must determine that you are competent enough to represent yourself. Here is a link to the department of Justice website which nearly summarizes the case law surrounding this issue, if you want to educate yourself.