Experts say world is ‘past peak fossil power’ but warn against uneven development of energy projects

Experts say world is ‘past peak fossil power’ but warn against uneven development of energy projects

Nuclear power generation is likely to break records in 2025 as more countries invest in reactors to fuel the shift to a low-carbon global economy, while renewable energy is likely to overtake coal as a power source early next year, data has shown.

China, India, Korea and Europe are likely to have new reactors come on stream, while several in Japan are also forecast to return to generation, and French output should increase, according to a report on the state of global electricity markets published by the International Energy Agency (IEA) on Wednesday.

Electricity demand is also expected to increase around the world, fuelled largely by the move to a low-carbon economy. Electric vehicles and heat pumps, as well as many low-carbon industrial processes, require electricity rather than oil and gas.

  • sus@programming.dev
    5·
    9 months ago

    That’s the dumbest take I’ve ever heard on this topic and that’s saying a lot

    So which part is wrong? Does pollution not kill millions of people each year? Is shutting down reactors on the other side of the planet a smart move when the causes of one disaster are completely inapplicable to them? Are both of these responses reasonable and proportional?

    And how do you know how many people were killed by the Fukushima triple meltdown that is in no way contained and has displaced tens of thousands of people permanently? The answer is we don’t know because the Japanese government has systematically suppressed any reliable information from coḿing out. Which just goes to show that nuclear power is a danger to democracy on top of all its other drawbacks.

    you’re sounding like a conspiracy theorist. I don’t think japan has a police state that is in the habit of suppressing all information. I’ll admit zero deaths is hyperbole for fukushima. There were probably a few deaths directly caused by, it, maybe a few dozen (at most, and totally unproven) from long-term health effects, and many deaths from the (unnecessary in hindsight) rapid evacuation. They still pale in comparison to the 19 thousand deaths from the tsunami that caused the disaster.

    Which just goes to show that nuclear power is a danger to democracy on top of all its other drawbacks

    Certainly not an enormous leap in logic at all. No sir. It’s just that the deadly nuclear radiation spontaneously causes the death of liberty. Russia only covers up their nuclear accidents (on those RBMK reactors they are still running) because of nuclear power, certainly not because of the way their society structured.

    And who ever said the alternative to building nuclear plants is building more fossil fuel generation capacity?

    You just said that. Nobody else said that.

    • Diplomjodler@feddit.de
      3·
      9 months ago

      you’re sounding like a conspiracy theorist.

      Like CBS?

      or the New York Times?

      or Mainichi?

      I could go on. This is public knowledge. But there’s no point trying to argue with the willfully ignorant. I’ll leave it at that.

      • sus@programming.dev
        3·
        9 months ago

        Did you even read your own articles?

        CBS:

        its delayed disclosure of the meltdowns at three reactorswas tantamount to a cover-up

        NYT:

        Culture of Complicity Tied to Stricken Nuclear Plant

        Mainichi:

        then TEPCO president Masataka Shimizu had ordered the company not to use the term “meltdown” to describe what had occurred

        None of these support anything close to the kind of cover up needed to result in a “nobody can know how many people died” level of lack of information. They’re mostly about failing to report the disaster fast enough and downplaying it by using certain wording and having a lax security culture. Not about the government preventing investigations or giving gag orders or something like that.