• Trebuchet@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    A mortgage where, for instance, 90% of each payment goes to repaying the capital of the mortgage, and 10% to the interest. There’s no way it’s fair that you should need to pay 2x the value of your house over 25 years.

      • Trebuchet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s not free. That’s just a less predatory rate of return.

        I would further suggest that there is a hard cap on the interest which can be charged on any borrowing.

        • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          But if I’m a lender and I have spare money to invest I can always just put it into the stock market where I’m on average getting a 7% yearly return. It only makes sense to lend that money to an individual if I’m getting a better rate. Otherwise I’m just losing money.

          • Trebuchet@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Then someone else will take that lender’s place. Mortgage lending will, at whatever percentage, produce a stable rate of return. If anything, preventing exorbitant interest rates mitigates much of the risk involved in lending.

            • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Then someone else will take that lender’s place.

              Why would anyone do that when they get better return for their money elsewhere? You’re basically expecting people to do charity or simply just be incompetent and make bad financial decisions thus effectively making you the scammer.

              • Trebuchet@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Hardly. The market still exists, and lenders can still make a profit, just maybe not as much. It’s not rocket science.

                • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That’s merely a desire for a more “fair” system or frankly just something that benefits you rather than someone else. The discussion here is about scams and my argument is that mortage is not one.

                  • Trebuchet@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    You asked for an alternative and I gave you one. You just aren’t happy at the idea that massive lenders can afford to make less.

                    And of course I’m motivated that it benefits me, and millions of ordinary people, what sort of psychopath wouldn’t be?

                    Mortgages are not a scam, I’ll give you that. But I’m pretty sure that anyone with a functional moral compass would recognise that usury is immoral.