To my understanding this difference between man/male just equals homosexuality and homosexual pedophilia. If it were to protect kids from pedos, it surely would use a word describing children, not male.
At the time it was written, both women and girls were property. They were not something to be protected, except that if they were damaged the owner was to be compensated.
To my understanding this difference between man/male just equals homosexuality and homosexual pedophilia. If it were to protect kids from pedos, it surely would use a word describing children, not male.
Children and women were considered property at that time, so it makes sense to have used the words they did.
At the time it was written, both women and girls were property. They were not something to be protected, except that if they were damaged the owner was to be compensated.