Non-paywall link

South Carolina high school English teacher Mary Wood was reprimanded last school year for teaching a lesson on race. She began teaching it again this year.

Mary Wood walked between the desks in her AP English Language and Composition classroom, handing out copies of the book she was already punished once for teaching.

Twenty-six students, all but two of them White, looked down at Ta-Nehisi Coates’s “Between the World and Me,” a memoir that dissects what it means to be Black in America — and which drew calls for Wood’s firing when she tried to teach it last year in her mostly White, conservative town. Wood crossed to a lectern and placed her hands on either side of a turquoise notebook, open to two pages of bullet points explaining why she wanted to teach Coates’s work.

“That book that you guys have, it deals with racism,” she said on a recent Tuesday. “It’s going to be something with which you’re unfamiliar. That you need to spend time to research to fully understand.”

Wood stared at her class. She tried to make eye contact with every teenager. Anyone, she reminded herself, might be secretly recording her — or planning to report her.

Plus, both teachers believed the book, a Pulitzer Prize finalist, is superbly written: a master class in the deployment of rhetorical devices. There was no better way to teach children how to formulate their own arguments, they thought.

“It teaches kids a different perspective, [it] teaches kids how to write well,” Wood said in an interview. And “it’s the right thing to do.”

  • admiralteal@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    She told her class they would spend the next few days listening to a recording of the book, while each student took notes. After that, they would conduct independent research to develop their own arguments. They could agree with Coates, disagree with him or land in the middle.

    Both teachers believed the book, a Pulitzer Prize finalist, is superbly written: a master class in the deployment of rhetorical devices. There was no better way to teach children how to formulate their own arguments, they thought.

    “It teaches kids a different perspective, [it] teaches kids how to write well,” Wood said in an interview.

    You’re just wrong about what kinds of works a good AP Lang class should be teaching. You’re wrong about what the class is, how it works, and what it intends. You’re wrong about the science of education going into this. You’re wrong about the cross-disciplinary nature of the lessons. You’re wrong about the purpose of this book being assigned. And in that wrongness you are advocating for a world where education does a worse job teaching kinds how to navigate and be resilient in a world full of people that are going to constantly be trying to convince them to believe certain things and act certain ways.

    • MxM111@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      OK, I admit, this changes my view. I read only what was posted - did not read the whole article. Well, it teaches me.

      • Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’m shocked and impressed with your change of tone. As someone who took AP English all through highschool, I’m glad to hear you can have an open mind

        • MxM111@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          When I am wrong, I am wrong. The information was missing in the original post, that created impression that she gave the book only because it is about racism, and that lead me to incorrect conclusion.