Pretty much in the title. Maybe you wouldn’t even use it, but would like to simply see it exist for the sake of having a federated alternative.

For me, it’d be the following:

  • LinkedIn
  • Meetup
  • Tiktok

I am on the first two, but would prefer a federated alternative. I’m not on Tiktok, but would like to see a federated alternative.

I’ll admit these might not be a good idea. But as a thought experiment, I’d be curious about the community weigh in on what you all think this might look like.

  • danhakimi@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    11 months ago

    I don’t think the fediverse needs more platform alternatives.

    What I really think we need is a way for people to use one fediverse account to log into different interfaces, so people can try out a new app / interface without starting a new account. Many apps can do this, but web apps generally cannot, they’re generally tied to an instance.

    • makeasnek@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      This requires having an identity that is separate from an instance. This is what nostr does and why I prefer it over mastodon. It also means if your mastodon or lemmy instance closes up shop, you don’t lose your post history, DMs, followers, etc.

        • makeasnek@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          If you are talking about something like openauth (where you sign into some random website using your Google account) yes, but your base identity is still tied to Google. So if Google goes down, you lose your google account, and you also lose your account at every other website you logged in to using your google account.

          If you are meaning transfer your account from google to say office365, this is possible but there’s a few problems:

          • If your instance shuts down without doing this, you lose everything
          • How does your instance choose which instance to transfer it to? What if users don’t like that choice?
          • Transferring means sharing your login credentials with the new instance.
          • Your “username” that you share and post online for people to follow you has changed. It’s no longer user@instance but user@newinstance. Some kind of a redirect could be setup I suppose.

          Some of these problems are solvable with some changes to the AP code. Some of them are not, at least not without a rewrite of the entire AP structure. Nostr sidesteps all these issues by simply not having your username tied to an instance in the first place.

          • danhakimi@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            If you are talking about something like openauth (where you sign into some random website using your Google account) yes, but your base identity is still tied to Google. So if Google goes down, you lose your google account, and you also lose your account at every other website you logged in to using your google account.

            Yeah, essentially that. The back-up plan in case your instance goes down is a separate issue, my main plan is just that users shouldn’t need a new account for each fediverse application they want to try, considering one account is already able to make any kind of post.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      That’s not technically possible.

      You could have one instance offer more than one platform, though, and you can already use multiple frontends with whatever instance you’re on. Kbin, which you’re on, actually tries to do the Swiss army knife thing IIRC.

      • masterspace@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        It’s entirely technically possible. Apps already use third party identity providers all the time, you just need federated apps to support OAuth both for signing in on the client and as a backend identity provider, and standardize how federated apps return user info that would be common to any federated app (usernames, saved / liked posts, subscribed feeds, stuff common to the ActivityPub spec).

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          You could use the same credentials to open a new account on another instance, sure, I guess. You still have to create another user on the new platform with their own ActivityPub inbox and so on.

          I guess to a non-technical user that might seem like the same thing, but then again so would your home instance allowing you to view other platforms. The second one would be way cleaner and easier on instance maintainers.

      • danhakimi@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        You can log into a pixelfed app on android with a mastodon account. Why can’t you log into a pixelfed web frontend with a mastodon account? What law of physics makes that impossible?

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Uhh, let’s see…

          After a search, it seems like they actually just copy the settings from your Mastodon account. It’s still a separate account. I’ll keep checking in case I missed something.

          It doesn’t even sound like they securely bring over the password, which presents a little bit of a phishing threat if people are re-entering their Mastodon password into third party apps like this one.

          Edit: Yup, here’s a video/gif. I’d do a federated link but I’m not sure Lemmy supports that yet.

          You could totally copy someone else’s Mastodon this way, so that’s fun.

          • danhakimi@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            alright, well that’s not great, but my point is more that we could update the protocol to allow this to be done securely and conveniently.

            • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              It would still be a separate account, but yes, seamless migration to a new instance could be a thing. There’s scripts for it already. OPs suggestion that you can just move between instances with the same account isn’t how the fediverse works.

              If you just want to been on Pixelfed and Mastodon, your instance giving access to both would be the cleanest, best way.

              • danhakimi@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                OPs suggestion that you can just move between instances with the same account isn’t how the fediverse works.

                I’m OP.

                I’m not sure why you’re speaking in the present tense about a suggestion I am making for the future.

                • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  Ah, sorry. Didn’t notice, there’s a few people talking to me.

                  Yes, it’s not a thing that could work. If you had some centralised way to handle accounts it wouldn’t be federated anymore. It would be another (semi-)walled garden or some kind of blockchain-ish thing, but either way it wouldn’t be ActivityPub-complient.

                  • danhakimi@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    If you had some centralised way to handle accounts it wouldn’t be federated anymore.

                    So why can’t you have some federated way to handle accounts?

                    but either way it wouldn’t be ActivityPub-complient.

                    Unless you changed activitypub, right?