The locomotive of a cargo train derailed in northern Colorado early Wednesday, spilling hundreds of gallons of diesel, authorities said.

The Great Western Railway locomotive did not tip over when it went off the rails at a switch in the tracks just before 1 a.m. but a fuel tank was punctured, the Loveland Fire Rescue Authority said in a Facebook post. The spill was contained and did not get into any waterways, it said.

No one was injured in the derailment, which happened near a sugar factory in an area not far from some homes, Battalion Chief Kevin Hessler said. The other locomotive and three cars carrying sugar did not derail, he said.

  • TWeaK@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    Most derailments are basically just the train falling off the track, very slightly. This was a full on train crash.

    • MinorLaceration@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      From the article and video, this seems to be one of those times it slightly came off the track. There doesn’t seem to have been collision and the train remained upright.

      • TWeaK@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        I dunno, it’s kind of borderline imo. It certainly suffered some damage, rather than a low speed step off that simply needs a crane to put things back into place.

        If you do something with your car and it suffers damage, it’s hard not to call that a crash. You might be able to drive it afterwards while holding the steering wheel at an odd angle, but you’ve still suffered crash-level damage.

        • MinorLaceration@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Sure, there’s damage, but the train didn’t crash into anything. If I drove into the shoulder of the road and ran over a piece of debris, I could easily damage my car, but I didn’t crash the car.

          There’s not really anything subjective here, the train didn’t crash into anything. It derailed and suffered damage.

          • TWeaK@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            If I drove into the shoulder of the road

            See that’s technically a crash. You collided with the curb. It might not be a crash into another vehicle or into something like a tree or a lamppost, but you’re still crashing into something.

            In this case, the train collided with the ground, after falling off the rails. A low speed derailment would have no damage - akin to spinning out in an open road or something - but if you hit something and cause damage that breaches some threshold.

            • MinorLaceration@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Driving over the lane lines does not involve hitting a curb. As I said, in this hypothetical scenario I drove into the shoulder and debris damaged my car. I did not crash.

              There’s nothing subjective about this incident. The train derailed. The train remained upright. The train did not collide with an object. The train was damaged. Honestly, you’re really doing some mental gymnastics to rationalize your decision to call it a collision. If you’re just going to do whatever you need to do to convince yourself that it was a collision, nothing I’m going to say will change your mind.