Striker@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 8 months agoTipping culture npcslemmy.worldimagemessage-square681fedilinkarrow-up11.26K
arrow-up11.26KimageTipping culture npcslemmy.worldStriker@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 8 months agomessage-square681fedilink
minus-squareformergijoe@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·8 months agoLook at this guy, paying $70 at a restaurant. How many are you buying for? 5?
minus-squareOgmios@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up6·8 months agoYea, buying a $70 meal then complaining about money being scarce is kinda… questionable.
minus-squarepyrflie@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up5·8 months agoProbably 2, maybe one at a nicer restaurant. If you’re in California or DC it might be lunch.
minus-squaremars@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-28 months agoMy bills for two people regularly come out to $50, at normal unfancy restaurants (sometimes even just fast casual). So $70 would be 3 people for me.
minus-squareVoyajer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 months agoThat’s a pretty normal 2 person meal nowadays, cheap if for 3. I’m not even in a high cost of living area.
Look at this guy, paying $70 at a restaurant. How many are you buying for? 5?
Yea, buying a $70 meal then complaining about money being scarce is kinda… questionable.
Probably 2, maybe one at a nicer restaurant. If you’re in California or DC it might be lunch.
My bills for two people regularly come out to $50, at normal unfancy restaurants (sometimes even just fast casual). So $70 would be 3 people for me.
That’s a pretty normal 2 person meal nowadays, cheap if for 3. I’m not even in a high cost of living area.