• bedrooms@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    I mean, if you view them as owners, yes, and that’s also the reality. But I want to argue there need to be good leaders.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      I don’t even think you need leaders at all, either. Decisions can be made by a collective, without necessitating a representative.

      But, either way, how do you incentive “good” Capitalists? To become a Capitalist is to become an exploiter.

      • bedrooms@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I’m out. Good luck with your view.

        Edit: out because I don’t see a sign you’re ready to accept reality.

    • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      What does good leadership have to do with the owning class?

      Are you suggesting that by virtue of owning things they are good leaders?

      • bedrooms@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        No.

        Anyone who controls said necessities but at least employs or otherwise benefits people of the working class.

        There are overlaps, but I’m tired of explaining nuances in this thread. I didn’t even write the owning class is good leaders. I instead mean that I wish what OP labeled as the owning class gets replaced with good leaders.