• Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    And stayed at the embassy until he couldn’t any more and was arrested by the Brits. I still don’t see what’s unfair.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      Again, the unfair part was not allowing him to leave for Ecuador. His Ecuadorian citizenship got revoked when the British arrested him, but he should not have been arrested because he was an asylum seeker granted Ecuadorian citizenship.

      Would you also oppose Jews seeking asylum in foreign consulates in pre-WWII Germany and Italy being taken out of Germany and Italy? One of those people was Albert Einstein.

      Or is Assange somehow a special case when it comes to seeking asylum.

      This isn’t even about Assange personally or whether or not he deserves to be prosecuted for what he did. This is about how the U.S. and Britain can get away with ignoring someone who has both been granted asylum and citizenship of a third country. And I don’t care if you are guilty or innocent of your crimes, that is simply wrong.

      • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        That’s not how it works. In order to leave the embassy he would have to set foot on Brit soil, and he had an arrest warrant. He was not granted asylum by Britain, only Ecuador. As I remember, they were the only country to say yes. They changed government, and there you go.