Measure allows parent to seek child support up to a year after giving birth to retroactively cover pregnancy expenses

The Republican-led Kentucky senate voted overwhelmingly on Tuesday to grant the right to collect child support for fetuses, advancing a bill that garnered bipartisan support despite nationwide fallout from a controversial Alabama decision also advancing “fetal personhood”.

The measure would allow a parent to seek child support up to a year after giving birth to retroactively cover pregnancy expenses. The legislation – Senate Bill 110 – won senate passage on a 36-2 vote with little discussion to advance to the House. Republicans have supermajorities in both chambers.

  • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    Imagine the gall to look around at this world and be so blinded by, I don’t know, narcissism, self-centeredness, hubris and think,“Yeah, what we need here is another fucking human.”

    • PLAVAT🧿S@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      Strongly disagree. Your position is that the current age-bearing demographic forego the experience of having children?

      I don’t think this is sarcasm but maybe I’m eating the onion?

      • SanndyTheManndy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        No civilized and intelligent being should enjoy bearing offspring as we currently do, anyway.

        If the instinct alone is enough to overcome their reasoning, then they are not truly mature.

        • PLAVAT🧿S@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          I think there’s likely some zeitgeist in play here that younger generations know they can’t afford kids. And I also imagine there’s animosity there. While having kids isn’t a prerequisite for personal joy (to each their own) it’s often a tremendously enjoyable experience. So who should they turn to for being put in this situation: the generation that should really skip having kids, sorry….

          Now, when I walk around stores on my day off and see homeschoolers with 5 kids I can agree with this sentiment: that feels stupidly selfish and excessive.

      • yamanii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        I forgot the name of the movement but some people think it’s abuse to have children. Mind you this was years before COVID and the current wars, maybe someone else remembers them.

    • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      The world is better now than at any point previously in history (except maybe the 90s). The only reason things sound worse is that we have global news now.

      What point is there in trying to make a better future if none of us have kids? Who are we trying to fix climate change for, our geriatric asses?

      Kids are emblematic of hope for a better future – that society can build and create something that we won’t benefit from, but our descendants will. I’d go as far as to say they should be the mascot of leftism and progressives. Everything we do should be to give them a better world than we had. It’s all moot otherwise.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Wow, I can u derstand some people might not want kids, but self-centeredness? It’s self- e entered to devote so much of your ti e and attention to someone else’s needs, for two decades of your life?

      • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        You’re not having a kid for the kid’s sake. You’re having to kid for your sake. Your self-centered sake. Not YOU, but like the general you.