• Alpha71@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    8 months ago

    Sooo… How do Republican’s square being the party of “Small Govt” and then interfering in a private business?

      • Eiim@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s really not though? The Chinese government has a 1% stake in ByteDance. Meanwhile ~60% is foreign investors – believed to be mostly American.

        • nialv7@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          8 months ago

          You have a misunderstanding of how China’s government operates. It does not matter how much stake the government holds, companies just cannot say no to the government’s request. Otherwise you will be disappeared. See Alibaba for example.

          Remember, China does not have a democracy.

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          8 months ago

          Then it should be easy to buy out that 1% stake.

          I’m not saying it’s a good bill, but reducing interference by foreign governments in US sold products is not against any party’s philosophies.

      • whereisk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 months ago

        Government is bad except when it comes to brutal subjugation of out-groups I don’t like, while the in-group gets protected and treated with kid gloves by the same.

        Unfortunately most of them are the dupes not the protected class they think they are - “they’re hurting the wrong people” summed it up when it was uttered…

        • retrieval4558@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          Too lazy to look up who said it, but there’s a quote I like that goes something like “conservative seeks to have an in group who the law protects but does not bind, and an outgroup who the law binds but not protects”