• GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I think there should be local-only players. VLC was one forever. There are tons of streaming service clients out there and I personally don’t want VLC to add this feature. But it is just my personal opinion. I never said it’s bad

      • It also supports some funky stuff like raw H.264 over UDP if you use ffmpeg to prepend special packets to the start of the video stream (Ideal for a DIY low latency video streaming solution ). If you decrypt digital OTA tv signals (DVB format), VLC will play the live underlying raw mpeg stream just fine.

        Truly a swiss army knife of video playback, especially the underutilized network url file open option

      • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Idk about that. I don’t even care much cuz I don’t use VLC at all. Lol I just wanted to send a regular short controversial unpopular opinion comment. I hope it’s not considered wrong here

      • pbjamm@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I mean it is right there in the name: Video Lan Client.

        My first use of VLC 20yrs ago was to stream video. it is the core of the product.

    • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      8 months ago

      VLC stands for VideoLAN Client, and was originally designed as a player for network streams provided by the VideoLAN server. It also supports local media playback, which has become its most common use. It adding additional streaming functionality is just reinforcing its original purpose.

    • ProtonBadger@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      One doesn’t have to use the feature and it’s not like it’s going to be felt, nor noticeably use any resources when not in use.