rt, will you ban it?

  • lps2@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    No man is an island and policies that aim to better the nation’s health are rarely for the benefit of the individual and rather are a way to benefit the masses by increasing productivity in the labor market, reducing healthcare costs, and generally making the nation more competitive on the international stage

    • w00tabaga@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right and I get that, and I’m not saying that’s a bad idea, but again I just get a really bad taste in my mouth for policies that aim to save people from themselves. It just feels like the government being a parent instead of a service of the people. Secondly, it doesn’t really fix the root of the problem, which doesn’t always have to be the goal in policies obviously, but reluctantly making people make decisions with higher prices. Where should the government stop then in using higher taxes to get us to do what it wants?

      Again, I’m torn on this because it may be the correct thing to do to cut down sugar consumption, but I hate the precedent it creates.