• snooggums@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    8 months ago

    Attention to the problem.

    You can act like it doesn’t work, but the Civil Rights movement had no traction until white people were inconvenienced.

    • aleph@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      There was a lot more to the success of the civil rights movement than simply blocking traffic.

      • snooggums@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        Sit ins, marching in the streets, and other disruptive actions that are comparable were a significant part of it.

        Not being the whole thing doesn’t mean it wasn’t important.

      • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        There’s this weird idea that the civil rights protestors were met with people clapping and cheering and waving American flags. They were not. Those protests were wildly unpopular in their time. It was only later on, after they succeeded in getting some change, that the attitudes and rhetoric around those protests changed.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Civil rights protests were effective.

          People who like the status quo do not want effective protests.

        • aleph@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I’m well aware. I was specifically talking about the modern tactic of sit-ins in the middle of busy intersections and protestors glueing themselves to the tarmac, and so forth.

          I never called into question political protest in general, even though that’s apparently what people are assuming I said.

            • GBU_28@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Violence is never appropriate unless in self defense. Bystanders don’t deserve to have their lives flipped over in the name of visibility.

                • GBU_28@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  The one from 1773?

                  I think it’s ancient history and we live in a more modern society.

                  I firmly believe in nonviolent protest, in the modern era, if you need the goalposts moved thusly