With climate change looming, it seems so completely backwards to go back to using it again.

Is it coal miners pushing to keep their jobs? Fear of nuclear power? Is purely politically motivated, or are there genuinely people who believe coal is clean?


Edit, I will admit I was ignorant to the usage of coal nowadays.

Now I’m more depressed than when I posted this

  • BigNote@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The problem isn’t fire, it’s that the waste at Hanford has leached into the soil and a plume of it is headed towards the Hanford Reach on the Columbia River. There’s a mitigation plan in place and it looks like it’s ultimately going to work, but it’s very expensive and not something that anyone wants to see happen again.

    • updawg@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was referring to the Westlake Superfund site in St Louis right next to the Missouri river

      • BigNote@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fair play. That said, please do look up Hanford. It’s way bigger than Westlake and is potentially a much bigger problem, though granted, Westlake is problematic as well.