• ale@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s valid. In theory, because you’re downloading open source on there, you could audit the apps you download, but don’t know anyone who does that unless it’s their job.

          • SlikPikker@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            My main issue is everything signed with the same key, and the way updates can go through without review.

            Obviously Play store isn’t safe or wonderful, but it does have better review policies.

      • rmuk@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is what really, really pissed me off about the iPhone. When it launched and they gave it a desktop-class web browser engine and told people they were going all-in in PWAs (though I don’t think the term existed at the time). Then v2 came out and they went sike! native apps, must be developed on our PCs, must be distributed by us, you must pay us to be allowed to develop, we take a cut of your income, and we’re going to cripple the PWA engine to make universal, open apps all but unusable.

        Dicks.

        • punseye@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Can PWAs perform just like native apps when it comes to smoothness and optimization?

          • rmuk@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes, if the underlying engine is designed to support it. There are standard web APIs for accelerated graphics, compute, offline storage, Bluetooth, push notification, environmental sensors, phone book access, camera, local storage access, and so on… A decent PWA is indistinguishable from a native app.

      • Carter@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is there any way of “installing” PWAs to the app drawer rather than been limited to a shortcut on the home screen?

        • SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Depends on the PWA, if they have the manifest setup properly it should give the option by itself and even the add to desktop button should change to install the app, but very few sites support it (among the ones I use)

          • essteeyou@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I do love Kotlin, but I work extensively with audio playback on a low level (Oboe, native) so a web app just won’t work for me.

            Also, I can’t really justify rewriting my company’s entire app because I don’t like Google’s monopoly.

        • jerkface@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          1 year ago

          Can you elaborate on “limited”? Surely that is what we want. One of the problems with the Play store is certainly not that it does not have a wide enough selection, but rather that it is full of harmful, hostile, dangerous, exploitive software. Any solution to that problem is necessarily going to limit (or one might prefer to say curate) its contents. That is exactly why I use F-Droid. It is limited to software that is not trying to hurt me.

            • jerkface@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Those products that you “need” to function as professionals are never going to be available in a way that does not exploit you and put you at risk. You’re always going to be trapped with the incumbent marketplace’s shitty practices until you take steps to meet those needs in some other way.

              You do not have to personally audit every application you use. After all, you DON’T audit closed applications, and neither does anyone else. At least with an application with code available under a public license, other people have the ability to review it and raise concerns. I can’t see how you can cast that as a disadvantage, just because you don’t personally want to audit the software yourself.

              Personally, I’m not comfortable predicating my very livelihood on closed, commercial software that somebody else owns and leverages with the specific intention of exploiting me. That sounds like fucking madness to me.

          • lickmysword@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            I guess F-Droid is limited in the sense of low user awareness? Similar to lemmy in the sense that its just not that popular atm, but maybe its gaining popularity?

            • null@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Sure, but that’s not going to be helped by making something new that’s “compelling” – which is the topic at hand

      • essteeyou@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Can I get my banking app on F-Droid? How about my home security system app? How about a dozen other apps that I want or need, and can’t be replaced by loading a website in Firefox?

        • butter@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is entirely on the companies. There’s no technical reason or requirement for this happening.

          Fdroid works great and is the most likely thing to be adopted, in my opinion. It’s easy enough for anyone to spin up their own fdroid server and distribute their own app.

          If you’re wanting to use a new store, you’re going to have to wade through the growing pains of adoption. It’s just a fact of life.

          • essteeyou@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m still waiting for Linux on desktop to be a big thing like I thought back in 2004. I suspect the third party app stores will be just as quick.

        • Cris@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wait, I assume if you install a banking app through Aurora it still works? Totally fair if that doesn’t work for your needs (you kinda need a google account, even if a blank one, to have it work right now) but I assume installing apps through it doesn’t limit them or make them less functional for having been installed through Aurora?

          • shortwavesurfer@monero.town
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Droid-ify can install apps in background (or at least without the package installer popup. The main f-droid app is still targeting too low of an android version to do it.

              • shortwavesurfer@monero.town
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Thats because the fdroid extension is installed. By default it cant do that. Google added the ability for app stores that target android 12 and above to update apps that also target android 12 or above without the package installer.