• dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    A) That link is behind a paywall. I could only read the first two paragraphs.

    B) The first two paragraphs are about how hard it is to find a place to put any new housing. It talks about converting existing spaces into housing, adding new units to existing apartment buildings, etc. And even then, it caps out at 60,000 POSSIBLE units while Austin is permitting over a thousand a month, many of which are single family homes that you are complaining about.

    That said, Austin has done a great job of building a ton of apartment buildings. So much so that businesses are complaining that housing prices are going down. It’s easier for Austin to do that, since they have both more space overall and less space that is already developed; but it’s great that they have broken the lines of NIMBY and bureaucracy to actually do it.

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yes, but out of those tens of thousands of possible houses they permit very little.

      Single family homes are not an issue in Austin because they have room for them. You are totally correct in that. But the big difference is being willing to change, SF voters are actually the home owners and they like their insane property prices