• cybersin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    France putting “boots on the ground” would mean a direct conflict between nuclear powers and would likely drag in the entirety of NATO.

    Unless you want to live Fallout, such an escalation would be absolutely insane.

    • Endorkend@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 months ago

      The threat needs to be there and real, otherwise Putin and Russia will never stop.

      THAT is the insanity.

      We’ve tried the economic approach, we’ve tried talking, we’ve tried not doing more than sending weapons to Ukraine.

      It clearly doesn’t work and Putin will just keep repeating what he has been doing until there’s actual repercussions to what he’s doing.

    • maynarkh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Not necessarily. NATO only gets involved if one of the members are fighting a defensive war, which this would not be, and the member in question specifically requests help.

      Most of NATO didn’t go to Iraq for example.

      • cybersin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yes, but that is irrelevant. France involving themselves opens them up to retaliation from Russia. If Russia retaliated against France, and even if not strictly required to by Article 5, it is likely other NATO countries would join the conflict.

        • maynarkh@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yeah, but Russia won’t retaliate, because it knows that. Russia committing genocide opened them up to retaliatory actions like this. I’m under no illusion that France is only there to protect its geopolitical ambitions against those of Russia, but Russia gave them a justification, escalated the conflict in a way.

          Let’s hope Russia won’t escalate further.