• Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    How do you so constantly and completely deflect any and all criticism to the other guy?

    I have the answer: because that’s how the two party system works to push you towards defending the genocide guy.

    Like, you get that the genocide support has a good chance of making him lose to the somehow-worse-genocide-guy, right? Like why aren’t you mad about that? Why do you constantly have to tell everyone to stop talking about the genocide support? You realise that’s a kind of genocide denial, right?

    • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      There are exactly two options here. It’s either the life long politician that’s actually been walking back support of the genocide, or the conman convict that has proudly stated he would be happy to make the shit even worse.

      Gee, I don’t know…

      I’m also not a one issue voter.

      • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        There are exactly two options with voting. I assume you don’t see any others because your entire political imagination has been contracted to voting. I believe I anticipated your answer when I said that the two-party system has done this to your brain.

        And “walking back” support of the genocide is one way to say that he hasn’t actually removed any of the material support, and also a way to obscure the fact that the “walking back” has mostly been lip service.

          • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Nobody.

            Two questions:

            1. Do you think I am somehow saying people shouldn’t vote for Biden? If so, can you explain where I have said that?

            2. Do you think the fact that Biden is the tactically superior choice means that we should not discuss that he is complicit in genocide?

            • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago
              1. Yes. Because that is the talking point for everyone that is obsessed with him sending arms to Israel.

              2. See response one.

              • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago
                1. You’re begging the question.

                2. So your focus on winning Biden the election necessitates genocide denial.
                  Not a denial that the genocide is happening, but a denial of holding the perpetrators accountable.

                • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  You’re a broken record. Yes, we all know Biden and the American governments stance on Israel. You’re not helping anyone repeating the same tired argument over and over and over and over. No one is denying anything. Wtf.

                  • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    7 months ago

                    So what is it? Should we not talk about it? Does it not matter? If you don’t want me to read into it then have the courage of your convictions and say what you fucking mean instead of talking around it with “see answer to 1”.

                    What do you propose we do about Biden’s genocide support? Just shut up about it? What?