EU should force a choice for all new PC. What OS do you want to run? Windows, Linux or Android? Then you would be able to see real competition in the OS market.
Maybe something like the raspberry pi OS chooser. In the best of worlds you have everything installed and just choose in the boot menu what to run.
I am just think that for a human to be a man or woman, then there is a 50 % chance. I see no reason for it to be different for chickens…
Putin, please stop this war without demands.
Ok, but it might be in other areas. Example lets see someone invent very high efficiently on solar panels with no weight at all. Or lets get rid of rubber wheels and do sifi so the car can hover over the road.
It would be wonder if they last forever and easly could be repaired. Making it better to keep the car then buy a new one. It just need to be upgradedable to the latest standards that might be more safe, efficient and agree with current law.
But I am pretty that would never exist - too hard.
Running updates at shutdown/upstart is something I am not a big fan of. It might be safe but I would rather roll back if something goes wrong.
Yes. The question comes down to how many of these you need. And do you have the resources for it?
It depends how out of date you are.
It was not an option one week ago when i tested it. Maybe because I was in WiFi range and Microsoft assumed you have to know the password to at least one of them to pass the wifi screen. No skip button. But could create a new account as unverified using gmail address.
Hexchat and pidgin. What to do now when they are not supported on wayland?
This is the part i dislike like with Fedora compared with Ubuntu. It is so many updates.
But since you can choose the time when to install the updates, there is a less of a problem.
Normally you don’t notice any difference. And updates is much faster to install on Linux in general. Windows eats loads of CPU.
Are they required by law or something to send those out? It is almost like needing to reconfirm your cookie in the webbrowser
I look at this from the developers perspective. Only need to learn one is good.
I don’t really see a problem with a snaps/flatpaks as long as they are not on application I use every day.
But maybe it is easier if we have one standard instead of two.
When Mozilla provide the firefox deb package - Why not give it then? IMO snaps/flatpacks are slower to start, can’t be updated while running, takes more diskspace, and takes longer time to update. With the isolation we also have different kind of problems - have you given it the correct permission?, and how do you get keepassxc browser extension to work with it(they dont support it)?
How many % of these 70% can’t upgrade to windows 11 due to hardware limitation?
Well, it is the many against the few rich. It is everyones planet.
I guess even pressing random buttons is fun enough.
I actually dont understand why we not do something drastic. I mean like ban cars and planes. We can still get around. Just not at the same speed at the moment. Someone will come up with a better idea then gas cars.
We also need to think about computers. Why throw them away? We could just make better software and keep the devices for a very, very long time. Heck, very bad computer could land on the moon…
Would it be a downside? Slower? Very costly?