![](https://futurology.today/pictrs/image/6da78f02-bbe7-4561-81e1-b8e9c1bde7fd.jpeg)
![](https://linux.community/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffry.gs%2Fpictrs%2Fimage%2Fc6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
Any video of this?
Ancient monk with magical superpowers
Any video of this?
bots in the chat
Removed by mod
it’s faar more reasonable to avoid resorting to sapping just to kidnap and attack civilians you don’t like
the meme itself was trying to stop you before you irradiated the whole damn image.
that’s racist and I’m telling every media outlet
what even is that thing shopping? a salamander?
no chocolate chip cookie?
so many pillows. i love pillows.
don’t let your dreams be dreams - shia labeouf
i need a wingman to toss me a ball the next time i’m in the club
they definitely threw a curve ball with scream. but then, why is it a curve ball? why not a free throw instead?
Your honor, the prosecution is sullying the defendant’s reputation
this just exposes that all those horror flicks were conservative propaganda. why else were all the teenagers engaged in premarital sex murdered first?
lets see how they feel it about after thriller starts playing.
coalminers: just making money, making sure my children have no future
thanks for the sauce. Its very enlightening.
it does trouble me to think that the creators of stable diffusion could be financially punished. Did they at least try to compensate the artists in anyway?
It “feels” as though it parallels consultation. These creatives are literally paid for their creations. If a software constructs a neural network to emulate intellectual property, does that count as consultation? Could/Should it apply to the software developers or individuals using the software?
From the technical side, I don’t understand how all the red flags aren’t already there. the source material was taken, and now any individual could acquire that exact material or anything “in the spirit of” that material through a single service. Is this a new way to pirate?
stable diffusion is a great opportunity for small businesses. especially in an increasingly anti-small business america (maybe that’s just california?) I’d hate for it become inaccessible to creators that would wield it properly.
as long as creatives retain the ability to sue the bad actors, i’m glad. I personally don’t need Open or whomever is directly responsible for stable diffusion and its training data to be punished.
i don’t know the specifics of the lawsuit but i imagine this would parallel piracy.
in a way you could say that Open has pirated software directly from multiple intellectual properties. Open has distributed software which emulates skills and knowledge. remember this is a tool, not an individual.
Any sauce to back up your words?