• Melllvar@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Large language models (what marketing departments are calling “AI”) cannot synthesize new ideas or knowledge.

    • redballooon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t know what you are talking about. GPT-4 absolutely can write new stories. What differentiates that from a new idea?

      • Melllvar@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I can’t tell whether you’re saying I don’t know what I’m talking about, or you don’t know what I’m talking about.

        • redballooon@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Doesn’t matter.

          When in conversation the “AI can’t have creativity/new ideas etc” argument comes up, I often get the impression it’s a protective reaction rather than a reflected conclusion.

    • HamSwagwich@showeq.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      First off all, yes they can for all practical purposes. Or, alternately, neither can humans. So the point is academic. There is little difference between the end result from an AI and a human taken at random.

      Secondly, LLMs aren’t really what people are talking about when they talk about AI art.

      • Melllvar@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        First off all, yes they can for all practical purposes. Or, alternately, neither can humans. So the point is academic. There is little difference between the end result from an AI and a human taken at random.

        Not even the AI companies’ marketing departments go that far.