The Trump II cabinet so far: Tulsi Gabbard, RFK, Jr. and Elon Musk.

  • samokosik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 months ago

    I do not think musk is stupid but he is an idiot. At least behaves like one.

    Whilst I do not think he has a low IQ, he certainly misses crucial points in many areas.

    • quafeinum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s really easy when you inherit wealth… hard part is inheriting wealth for most people though

    • ClamDrinker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      People forget emotional intelligence is also just as much if not more important than logical intelligence when attempting to change the world for the better. And both Trump and Musk rank among the lowest of low there.

      • Eximius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        It, honestly, is not. If you want to decide what is fair, what is true, what is good, you dont fucking believe the universe god flows through your emotions. Instead, you think logically, and try to analize and understand what in the human world are the concepts of liberty, good life. And also, analizing whether your emotions are dumbly guiding you in stupid directions.

        You cannot solve any societal problems with emotional feeling of what is good. That is what republicans do. Empirical bullshit loosely based on their inherent emotional desires of racism, chauvinism and the rest of the assorted bag of megalomaniac insanity pills.

          • Eximius@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Relying on logic and rationalism is just intelligence. Emotional Intelligence is understanding and to some degree using peoples emotions, if you want to be very correct. You dont use emotions to define social policy, and hopefully, any social policy will be devoid of emotions, because that can only lead towards confusion, biasedness and group mentality.

            If you want to define EI as ability to step away from one’s own emotions. Sure. We can agree with that. Personally I would just call that intelligence.

            • ClamDrinker@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Every piece of legislature ever needs to deal with the emotions of it’s subjects. An unemphatic, but cold hard rational law, will be nothing less of tyrannical most of the time. Laws are for humans to follow, and humans have emotions that need to be understood for a law to be successful and supported to last into the future. A law that isn’t supported by it’s subjects eventually leads to revolution (big and small).

              How logic and rational a person can be is highly dependent on their emotional intelligence. You might be able to suppress your emotions when there is no stress at all, but if you cave during a stressful situation and start lashing out, that does impact your overall intelligence. Intelligence is just the collection of behaviors and training that make you effective at doing what you want to do, and being rational and logical is definitely good, but not the end of it all.