• Soup@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    That isn’t going to happen. And in the very off chance that it does- the government is guaranteed the win, and the people will suffer.

    Greatly.

    • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The government is made of people. Those people might refuse to do their jobs too.

      A protest is SUBSTANTIALLY more likely to happen than the original suggestion of charging state lawmakers with murder. There’s no murder charge that would qualify.

      • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Reckless endangerment and manslaughter.

        They were warned that women would die due these laws and they didn’t listen. They recklessly put those laws there and people died… resulting in manslaughter.

        I’d prefer homicide too, but I feel like manslaughter charges would stick better because you don’t have to prove intent, just that someone died because of their actions.

      • Soup@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Riiiiight. Well, have fun storming the castle. Just don’t make a mess on my street, okay? I don’t want to have to clean that shit up.

          • Soup@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            And there it is! Internet activists calling people they know nothing about “cowards”. Typical lemmy rhetoric.

            You’re going to have to forgive me if I walk away from this conversation having felt a touch of second-hand embarrassment for you. That’s just me being me.

            I’m just empathic that way.