Edit: Just found this graphic. Tampa could very well be fucked on a Katrina level without any levees breaking.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      1 month ago

      That said, The Weather Channel is claiming that if it hits at high tide, the storm surge could be up to 15 feet, which is 5 feet higher than the average tsunami. I don’t think any city is prepared for that eventuality.

        • homoludens@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          It’s probably because of the last sentence. Which technically is a fact (because they obviously think that), but 5m is something at least cities in northern Germany are usually prepared for.

            • njm1314@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              Nobody said 5 m above anything, the original comment was 5 ft above the average tsunami. So 15 ft total which isn’t quite 5 m but it’s close ish.

              • andrewta@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                Sorry about the error of switching from ft to m.

                But still 5 ft above an average tsunami is a large increase. I’d be surprise if most coastal cities could handle that

      • homoludens@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’m not sure how exactly the tides are measured and if it differs internationally, but we have floods at around 5m every few years without any significant damage (German source). Hamburg had a flood with 6.45m in 1976 without damage to the city (only the port and other parts outside the levees were obviously damaged; German source).