More than 100 Arizona Palestinian, Arab, Muslim, and progressive Democrats and community leaders have signed a letter making the case for those reluctant to support Kamala Harris against Donald Trump.

“We know that many in our communities are resistant to vote for Kamala Harris because of the Biden administration’s complicity in the genocide,” the letter, published Thursday night, reads.

“Some of us have lost many family members in Gaza and Lebanon. We respect those who feel they simply can’t vote for a member of the administration that sent the bombs that may have killed their loved ones,” the letter continued. “As we consider the full situation carefully, however, we conclude that voting for Kamala Harris is the best option for the Palestinian cause and all of our communities.”

  • ArugulaZ@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    5 days ago

    Tankies: “B-but now we can’t swing the election to Trump with our constant whining and unrealistic demands!”

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      5 days ago

      Trump will cause millions to die in the middle East and in Ukraine. Being pro peace and pro Trump is impossible. These people are either massive, massive morons or saboteurs.

      • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        Indeed he will, and so will harris. Biden has slow walked support for Ukraine as well.

        I’m sorry Kamala has decided to be a shitty human (its hardly just gaza that has caused my vote to be casted for a 3rd party). But thats the way the cookie crumbled. I can do more to protect people on these shores via other means of direct action. Kamala changing positions on gaza is all i can do for my Palestinian brothers and sisters.

        • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          4 days ago

          Your third party vote causes waaaay more damage to “people on these shores” (and on all other “shores”) than any possible direct action could mitigate. Any legal action, anyway.

    • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      If you think changing a position on genocide is unreasonable, you are the problem. No one is saying dont protect israel, no one is saying they cant defend themselves. Neither situation applies atm. Israel is the aggressor at this point.

      Have you ever noticed how everyone goes on and on about the right to defend themselves and then conveniently ignoring that as soon as the threat is neutralized self defense no longer applies?

      Israel is the antagonist at this point. They dont have to keep invading new regions. They’ve managed to kill more hostages than they’ve rescued.

      They keep killing journalist, doctors, nurses, etc from international organizations.

      If you think telling kamala and the Democrats to stop supporting this is unreasonable: You. Are. The. Problem.

    • sandbox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      Refusing to support genocide is an unrealistic demand, and it also makes you a tankie, despite the fact that tankies are known for refusing to acknowledge historical genocides.

      • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        😂 imagine thinking not supporting a genocide is an unreasonable demand. Say the quiet part out loud. Phew.

        Seek help child. You certainly need it.

        • sandbox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          I think you misunderstood my point. I am absolutely opposed to genocide and all those who support it.