• PugJesus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s more expensive. It’s why I cut down on chocolate once I tasted real chocolate. I couldn’t go back to Hershey’s.

        • Gork@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          Just about any other brand milk chocolate is better than Hershey’s milk chocolate bars. My favorite is Lindt.

          • PugJesus@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            1 year ago

            I generally prefer dark chocolate once I learned there was more than “Shitty Hershey Dark Chocolate” in existence, so I go with Ghirardelli. 72% cocoa, that’s the stuff.

      • ubermeisters@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        Answer, because not everything you purchase is straight to chocolate and you don’t always get an option of where the chocolate is sourced

        • Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          57
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Bullshit, there’s plenty of good chocolate in any major retailer. I can go to my local grocery store and find Godiva, Ghirardelli, Lindt, Ritter, along with a wide selection of miscellaneous European imports.

          The stuff you’ll find in stores is not “premium chocolatier in the Swiss Alps” quality, but it’s decent chocolate and it’s not hard to find.

          • popcap200@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            27
            ·
            1 year ago

            Big agree. People won’t admit it, but they just buy what they’re familiar with and complain about it being bad.

            • Zammy95@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              1 year ago

              I think a large detterent for many is the price difference. Hershey’s kind of matches that snack price for a little treat you’d find at the front counter. Going back to the good stuff and seeing it 3 or 4 times the price will lose a lot of people. There’s a reason people say you get what you pay for though…

                • mxcory@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I am buying $1 bars of dark chocolate at dollar general now. Luckily I haven’t really had good chocolate, so I don’t know what I am really missing, and I like it better than Hershey’s milk chocolate to me. Claims profits help literacy, so I doubt it is really that great of a chocolate when you get down to it. But I like it and that is enough for me.

              • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Chocolate made it all the way down to snack price because of slavery and a lack of safety. So I no longer treat chocolate as a snack.

          • squiblet@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            There’s a large range of smaller brands too. Pascha, Cultura, Raaka, Taza, Lily’s, Theo’s, Tony’s, Green and Black, Alter Eco… plus dozens of tiny regional brands. It’s about like craft beer.

        • squiblet@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can find way more than that available at a chocolate shop, organic/natural grocery store or coffee shops and bookstores.

    • zik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 year ago

      If I had to name any chocolate that tastes like it has lead and cadmium in it, that’d be Hershey’s.

    • lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I haven’t eaten Hershey’s in so long because I remember it tasting mildly of vomit. Am I the only one who thinks the flavor has hints of vomit? What even is that?

        • SheeEttin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Honestly, I can barely taste it, so I don’t mind. I don’t think Hershey is that bad. It’s not good, but it’s not bad. It’s the cheap stuff.

          Lead and cadmium aside. No food product should have either of those in it.

          • Misconduct@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ah, I see. You do realize that reacting to “processed” things isn’t really actually a thing though right? Those are all pretty different. Either you’ve got an allergy to something they have in common or you’re letting all the fear mongering get to your head. Oooorrrrr I suppose you may get a bit of a totally normal upset stomach if you never eat anything but fresh food and then have some cookies. Which is again totally normal because it’s now not something that you regularly have in your diet.

            Either way, the processed food fear mongering is frankly getting kind of old. You’re not reacting to processed foods because they’re all “processed”. That’s not really how it works with such a variety. The way people with less resources are shamed or made to be afraid of perfectly accessible and shelf stable food isn’t really acceptable anymore. I really wish you guys would go back to being “intolerant to gluten” again or something else for attention. That actually did wonders for the people that are actually intolerant lol. I hear blaming everything on ADHD is very popular right now!

    • ares35@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      i’m weird, i guess. i like the ‘nasty’ american chocolate. i just can’t afford it except on november 1st.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 year ago

    Thank goodness that their horrid rotten flavor is a perfect deterrent for anyone who ever had real chocolate.

  • Bell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 year ago

    A confused spokesperson for Hershey argued that none of their products actually contain real chocolate.

    • pdxfed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      Cannot be sold as chocolate in the EU for two reasons;

      1.it doesn’t contain the menial amount(10%!) of chocolate required to be labeled as such.

      1. No one wants to buy that awful tasting shit
      • tacosplease@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Pretty sure the percentage of milk fat is also too low for American Hershey’s chocolate to be classified as chocolate in Europe.

        • Trantarius@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Why would any milk fat be required for something to be defined as chocolate? Chocolate doesn’t have to contain any milk at all. The only thing my brief research turned up was this, stating that they could only contain up to 5% non cocoa vegetable fats.

          Edit: This claims there is a minimum milk fat for milk chocolate, but no requirement for chocolate in general.

  • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hershey’s be like “the slaves who were responsible for putting the poison in the chocolate have been shot. New slaves are being brought in forthwith.”

  • jadegear@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s more lead allowed in a liter of drinking water in the US than a serving of any of the chocolates being reported, as far as I can find. (15 micrograms per liter.) Provided nobody’s eating a few dozen bars of chocolate in a single sitting I can’t imagine accumulating enough to cause acute harm from the chocolate alone. Chasing down Hershey, Nestle et al to hold them accountable is great, but in terms of toxic metals we’d have more success and greater impact lighting up the news about water supplies.

    Just mildly frustrated that I continue to see talk about chocolate while drinking water is a necessity and consumed in greater amounts daily but rarely gets reported outside of extreme cases like Flint.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sure, but getting that same amount of lead from water as well as each type of food you eat is going to add together.

      • Misconduct@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Sure, but you can just not eat Hershey bars. It’s really such a trivial concern when compared to the drinking water for entire populations.

        • Flambo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          For one, it’s not an either-or thing. Reporting on lead in chocolate isn’t detracting from awareness of lead in water.

          Sure, but you can just not eat Hershey bars.

          And second: that. There’s lead in this chocolate? Okay I won’t eat this chocolate. Lead intake reduced.

    • mrchampion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you sort by highest lead content you get “NOW Healthy Foods Certified Organic Cocoa Powder 100% Pure” as the top result, and highest cadmium content you get “Sunfood Super Foods Raw Cacao Powder- Certified Organic” at the top. I find it hilariously ironic that the two highest ones are “Certified Organic”. Also, the highest lead one was “100% pure”.

      • andrewta@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        What does the “ug” stand for in that table. It isn’t actually a “u” but it kind of looks like a u

      • phx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lead would be considered organic to the extent that it’s not added to the product. Hell arsnic is organic.

        • mrchampion@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If by that you mean that the lead was naturally added when it was growing and not during any processing stages, then see https://lemmy.world/comment/4831887. According to an article I found, most of the lead seems to be coming from the the cocoa being processed, not from when it was first grown. Although, it IS only one article, so I may be wrong.

      • PainInTheAES@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s because cacao containing cadmium/lead is an “organic”(ish) problem. The cacao tree pulls it from the soil.

        Edited (See below for correction)

        • mrchampion@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s interesting, I didn’t know that before, so I did a bit of research on this, and while you are right that Cacao seeds do absorb some lead naturally when growing, a couple studies have shown that most of the lead that ends up in cacao likely comes from after the farming stage,

          Because of the high capacity of cocoa bean shells to adsorb lead, contamination from leaded gasoline emissions may occur during the fermentation and sun-drying of unshelled beans at cocoa farms. … However, the much higher lead concentrations and larger variability in lead isotopic composition of finished cocoa products, which falls within the global range of industrial lead aerosols, indicate that most contamination occurs during shipping and/or processing of the cocoa beans and the manufacture of cocoa and chocolate products. source

          So most lead contamination came from processing the chocolate rather than from the tree absorbing it. Also, the same article says that the lead is likely from gasoline vapors, not from the soil,

          One source of contamination of the finished products is tentatively attributed to atmospheric emissions of leaded gasoline, which is still being used in Nigeria. Because of the high capacity of cocoa bean shells to adsorb lead, contamination from leaded gasoline emissions may occur during the fermentation and sun-drying of unshelled beans at cocoa farms. Source (same as before)

          I haven’t read the whole article, but I think this is good enough to serve as a counter-argument. Also, I know the article says “cocoa” instead of “cacao”, but it seems “cocoa” is basically just processed “cacao”, according to this article on healthline. So basically, the use of cacao and cocoa is inconsistent and may just refer to cocoa beans and/or processed cocoa beans.

          Also, I found this article, which seems like the abstract to this source, but I can’t figure out if it really is or not. If anyone has any idea of the relationship between the two articles I’d be happy to hear it.

          • PainInTheAES@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s some pretty solid research! Thanks for taking the time to look into it and correct me. I didn’t realize leaded gasoline was still widely used. It will likely continue to poison the soil as well.

            It does appear there is some bioaccumulation of cadmium (PDF) though/contamination from the soil during processing as CyberDine pointed out.

    • jennwiththesea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Whoa, that site is awesome! I switch between Ghirardelli’s and Lindt’s super dark bar varieties. Looks like I need to stick with Ghirardelli.

    • PainInTheAES@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I mean they kinda do, the cacao tree pulls those elements (cadmium) out of the soil or the cacao is in contact with soil containing those elements during processing. Many brands have issues with lead and cadmium but it can be mitigated by choosing a better supplier, frequent testing, and protecting product better during shipment. Mentioning Hershey’s is going to draw a lot of attention especially right before Halloween but it’s a common issue in chocolate.

      Edited with some corrections. Also mrchampion pointed out further down in this thread that it is likely the lead contamination comes from leaded gasoline during shipment.

      • CyberDine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The article mentions that the cadmium can largely be mitigated by preventing the beans from touching dirt in the drying process and shielding them from heavy metal dust. The lead though is probably introduced at the factory, and that’s obviously a problem but not immediately clear where it’s being introduced.

        It also mentions that the only likely reason milk chocolate doesn’t have these unsafe levels is because the dairy content reduces the amount of pure chocolate requires for the mix. So both milk and dark chocolate are bad, it’s just milk chocolate has cocoa in it and thus less heavy metal.

        • PainInTheAES@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          mrchampion corrected another comment of mine in this thread that links studies saying the lead might change from leaded gasoline used during the shipping process.

          This publishing (PDF) does seem to indicate the is done degree of bioaccumulation of cadmium in the cacao plants though.

  • spider@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    So now maybe they can mine chocolate for raw material to make batteries. :-o

  • clearleaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    But we just brought out “Her She” packaging. Now you want us to remove lead, which was saving us over a quarter cent per pallet? Millennial entitlement is truly boundless.

  • TinyPizza@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    I ate a chunky bar the other night, because you know, sadness, and then went for a run a while later. A mile or so in my kidneys started to hurt. I can’t say it was for sure the chunky bar but they haven’t hurt like that before or since. What type of villainous corporate hack poisons the thing that’s supposed to be the small escape of joy?

    Also, Chunky is Nestle but still my bias says poison. I’m prepared to now receive your insults for liking Chunky bars.

    • krellor@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      The common thread seems to be the concentration of cocoa solids, since all the concerning products had greater levels (dark chocolate, powders, etc). The Chucky bar being milk chocolate should be fine, per the article.

        • krellor@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you are taking about supporting a particularly flagrant bad corporate actor, then I agree. If about the safety of the milk chocolate, then the article indicates otherwise.

  • girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Here’s Consumer Reports Dec. 2022 report that lists chocolate by company.

    This was the report that started a run on dark chocolate from certain sources that helped raise prices to the crazy levels they are now (along with a worldwide shortage).