• FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Despite the predictable dumpster fire of a comment section sharing this would inevitably lead too, I’m glad you shared it, it was a pleasant read.

  • tleb@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The collapse of X should’ve been the movement to get rid of social media, not replace it with another identical platform

  • mat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    10 hours ago

    So tired of hearing about this platform that, afaiu, is barely even federated and not really decentralized. Why the hype when fedi exists?

  • WalnutLum@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Pages that don’t work well with darkreader aren’t many, but when they do fail they fail somewhat entertainingly:

  • quirzle@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I hate that social media business news qualifies as “technology” these days.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      21 hours ago

      It doesn’t, but the mods (not just these ones, but of any technology community) never seem to remove posts that aren’t actually about technology.

      • bamboo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Because the definition of what is and isn’t technology is arbitrary. Wikipedia says “Technology is the application of conceptual knowledge to achieve practical goals, especially in a reproducible way.” By that definition, social media is a technology (uses knowledge of computers and networking to enable online communication), but also so are most human creations.

  • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I have a really hard time seeing a difference between X and Bluesky. Both are run by billionaires for their amusement and benefit. Why are people so hopeful about bluesky?

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It’s run by a millionaire, not a billionaire. People like it because it’s Twitter without Musk. That’s it.

    • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Having used it for several days now, I can tell you the difference is that Bluesky is a lot like Lemmy - not filled with hate and vitriol, and easy to make it what you want by selecting your feeds and following things you care about while pruning the rest.

      The people who can’t socialize properly with others are swiftly dealt with. Subscription blocklists make it really easy to just annihilate any possible interaction between yourself and undesirables. I have several blocklist subscriptions for MAGA chuds and White Supremacists for example. And when you block someone on Bluesky they can’t see what you write and you’ll never see anything from them ever again. Zero interaction from that point on. So the housekeeping actions actually keep the house clean.

      Once you’ve done the initial housekeeping, it’s just full of people talking about cool stuff, and when someone crashes the party to be nasty they are quickly shown the door. It’s wonderful.

      • zabadoh@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Also trying out Bluesky, and it is a lot like Twitter used to be, but it has the potential to turn out like Xitter is today, because at the end of the day Bluesky is a for-profit startup corporation.

        Sooner or later, Bluesky is going to want to make money for its shareholders, and that means any of: 1) Selling advertisements, 2) Selling your personal data, and/or 3) In a classic tech startup play, selling itself to the highest bidder like: Android, YouTube, and yes, Twitter.

        And with commercialization, or in Xitter’s case a fool with too much money, comes enshittification.

        Lemmy is nothing like a for-profit startup company, as far as I know, but that doesn’t make it enshittification-proof, but at least it won’t take the commercialization route.

        • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I was talking about the atmosphere, not the architecture.

          It’s the best thing out there of its type right now. I’m not going to shit on it because of what might happen in the future. I’m sure something else will come along to move to if that happens.

        • TheBananaKing@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          17 hours ago

          It’s not the unusable firehose that mastodon is, and it’s a lot less fediverse-stanny. (it’s not actually federated yet).

          I kind of like it, it feels like the right level of engagement, and there’s a culture of just block the assholes, grownups are talking.

          It’s worth a few days to try it out. Nice place.

      • shoulderoforion@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Dorsey is THE founder of BLUESKY, and is it’s largest shareholder, even though he is no longer on the board, and went through the theater of closing his BLUESKY account, he will have the say as to who BLUESKY is sold to, when eventually it will be. Fool me once.

      • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Oh, really? OK, that makes it definatelly less terrible. I guess I need to update myself about the organization behind it then. Thanks for the correction!

    • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Because one of them is actively promoting and favouring viewpoints many people find abhorrent.

      The fact it’s owned by a billionaire isn’t the major concern for most people.

      • emb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Yes. Having centralized ownership (to whatever extent) is a concern for sure, but it’s a hypothetical concern in and of itself: “what if the leadership does bad things?” Is different from “the leadership is currently doing bad things.”

        Decentralization helps. But if the networks effects aren’t behind it, jumping from platform to platform when things DO get bad is also viable.

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Oh, gee, there’s this thing called Bluesky that’s an alternative to Xitter?

    Never seen anything about it ever posted here and in every other community before, thanks for letting us know!