• BigBenis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    6 days ago

    The modern Democratic party fights harder against its own “base” than they do against the opposing party. People still came out in droves to vote for them despite that but their dedication to complacency in a system that is failing everybody but the rich left enough people behind to tip the scales. The Dems have enabled this and anybody who expects them to save us from it is delusional.

  • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    6 days ago

    You can’t berate people into voting the way you want. That is the lesson the DNC needs to learn if they actually want to win.

    Social media trolls could do to realize that too.

  • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    5 days ago

    Even when Democrats are in power, they still don’t do anything hardly at all. I have voted Democrat for a long time now, but what we really need to do is get rid of First Past the Post voting in America, as it would really light a fire under them to be effective or be replaced.

  • FreakinSteve@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    5 days ago

    We all voted for Biden even though we KNEW he would be worthless but that’s who was forced on us…and then for four years he ABSOLUTELY REFUSED UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCE to do his Number One Job of defending the US against domestic terrorism and insurrection.

    ABSOLUTE REFUSAL.

    And then his successor campaigns as a GWB acolyte and gives vague, rambling non-answers to very simple questions while telling the constituency to go fuck themselves.

    You figure it out

  • arthurpizza@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    6 days ago

    Realistically, it’s the Democrats who failed the voting public. Their campaign of “We offer you nothing!”, did not seem to drag in very many undecided voters. You and I might be very politically active, but the majority of Americans are not.

    You need to give them a reason to go out and vote. A lot of people have very short attention spans, and easily forgot how bad Trump was the first time around and shaming the people for their shortsightedness is not how you win elections.

    • But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 days ago

      Keep telling yourself the democrats failed and somehow they are now suffering, they aren’t, they’ll get to take 4 years off and enjoy their wealth, it’s the voters who tried to punish the dems by not voting who are the morons

      • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        6 days ago

        Keep telling yourself the voters are morons until we lose in 2026 and 2028. If Democratic candidates don’t convince people to come out and vote we are lost.

          • TheresNodiee@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 days ago

            Hey I’m Canadian too. Don’t speak for “the rest of us.” It’s the Democratic parties’ own gd fault that they lost. If you can’t convince the average voter to vote for you when you’re running against an obviously volatile, incompetent, narcissistic, geriatric moron with fascistic tendencies backed up by the world’s richest and least charismatic deadbeat dad then you done fucked up.

                • But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  I was born in Central America and have lived on every extreme of my continent, is that an issue for you? I’ll stay out of American affairs when Americans stay out of everyone else’s and then act alert righteous while lecturing others, you’re all so full of shit.

        • peregrin5@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          If we lose in 2026 and 2028 I think that would just further prove that voters are morons.

          The only people actually losing here are the American people.

      • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        6 days ago

        But that’s the problem. The voters are all morons. The Democrats knew this. And Republicans were giving a master class on how to make that work. But the Democrats didn’t do anything. They treat politics like a friendly game of Monopoly. They assume the rules are magically enforced. So when the Republicans started to cheat, the Dems kept playing by the rules. And now we have a fascist government.

        Also, I don’t think the Democrats are suffering. They’re all rich. They can live just fine in a fascist US, they have enough money. We are the ones that are going to be loaded onto the trains.

        • Revan343@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          Their point was that the Democrats didn’t fail, because they didn’t try in the first place

    • randon31415@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      Biden was the “Nothing will essentially change” candidate. We finally pushed him out, but Harris only had 2 weeks to come up with “Something”. That something? A small tax credit for small businesses that was DOA in the house. It was probably why they didn’t promise anything else - if a TAX CUT isn’t passing the GOP controlled parts of congress, what the heck could Harris promise that would?

      • ryegye24@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        “That something” also included the largest medicare expansion in history and $25k first time homebuyer assistance.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      The democratic message was less “we offer you nothing” than “nothing will change”.

      Nothing will change has good sides and bad sides. The bad side is that there are no new radical fixes, just small, incremental changes.

      The good side of nothing will change is… well look at the absolute chaos of the Trump second presidency. Installing absolutely unqualified candidates everywhere, the military’s first DUI hire for secretary of defence. The absolute destruction of USAID. Musk’s chaos putting BigBalls in charge of trillions of dollars of government spending.

      (And, as an aside, it’s not even true that with the democrats nothing was going to change. Just look at the progress they had been making on antitrust. But, it’s true that they were shit at messaging and taking credit for their accomplishments.)

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 days ago

        “We offer nothing” and “nothing will change” are fundamentally the same thing when things are objectively bad.

        • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          If you are eating raw veggies and corn flakes nothing will change means you eat boring food. Offering nothing means you die a painful death. See the difference?

    • But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      6 days ago

      The people complaining hardest are the ones who called democrats genocidal fascists and refused to vote. This site was filled to the brim with anty Democrat posts at election time, now it’s filled with “why aren’t they doing anything??” Posts, it’s the same people

    • drthunder@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I think if you voted for Democrats you get to complain, but if you were eligible to vote and didn’t have to jump through a ton of hoops to do so you don’t get to complain. This could have been avoided.

      edit: to be clear, I don’t think Democratic leadership really cares that we’ve got a dictator. But voting for them was harm reduction and too many people couldn’t be bothered, whatever the reason.

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      you are absolutely welcome to complain, however i would advise you to complain about actual real issues, rather than “black hole issues” like “The DNC didn’t personally target me and now i feel left out” because let’s be honest, nobody fucking cares. We have problems to be solving, not shit to be moping over.

  • thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    fuck it. I voted dem every election and they did fuckall. We got obamacare, whoop deee doo. we have to buy insurance now. fat load of good that did.

    Fuck the dems. I’m leaving and voting for some other party, and you should too. campaigning for a third party should start right fucking now, so the dems can’t say “oH, ThE TiMe FoR SuPpOrTiNg a ThIrD pArTy IsN’t 5 MoNtHs BeFoRe An ElEcTIoN!” Fuck you, you goddamned fake ass left party.

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 days ago

      You’re 100% right, but just a heads up, you absolutely will hear dems say that. Campaigning for a third party started long ago and you just joined in.

      Dems will have no idea how long you’ve been supporting third-party candidates, and will only recall the discussions they hear while engaged - during election season.

      • Jyek@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 days ago

        This is a little bit dishonest. It’s not about the length of time you support a party but how much general support they have. You absolutely should support third party and grow the voter base on local and state and even push for larger support. But the spoiler effect is very real. In major elections where voting third party will elect the individuals most likely to harm you and your lifestyle in the most severe ways, and it is extremely obvious that third party has no real horse in the game, you hurt more than yourself. I agree Dems either need to figure their shit out and cut out the cancer or they need to get the fuck out of the way, but until third party candidates stand a real chance at national change for good, i will only be voting for them in elections they either stand a chance in or where showing support for them will help grow the voter base while limiting harm. Mid terms, vote 3pt. Primaries, vote 3pt. General election? Vote to minimize harm while maintaining a potential win.

        • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Damn right the spoiler effect is very real. It was obvious to everyone that it needs to be fixed at a national level in 2000, and obvious that it needs to be fixed in the Democratic primaries in 2020.

          So why would we believe any excuse for not opposing it with clone independent voting systems, like third-party candidates do. I’m surprised those don’t strike you as dishonest.

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Yes! This is the time to campaign for a third party, or put forward more progressive Democrats, or take a short-sighted meaningless stance on a genocide being done by someone else somewhere else.

      However, 2 years from now, in November, you need to vote for the candidate that is most able to win against the fascist ass-kissing trump sycophant, even if they aren’t a 100% match for your political views or objectives.

      Edit: judging from the votes on this comment, we’re gonna lose again because half of you refuse to learn anything from history that (metaphorically) happened yesterday.

      • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        I will vote 3rd party from now on myself ever since biden signed that funding bill that screwed trans youth of military families. I see now that the democrats will eventually throw us all under the bus and that there is no future remaining in the party.

        However… there is a way to get me to list the democrats as my bottom pick. With a more representative electoral system, I would be able to vote 3rd party yet still put the democrats as ranked down as possible on my ballot so that if my preference doesn’t win my vote would be transferred to the democratic candidate.(I won’t be listing the republicans on my ballot)

        So in conclusion, if you would like for my vote to count for the democrats, you MUST push your state legislature to pass electoral reform and to do away with First-past-the-post voting. Feel free to not do so, but if the republicans win that’s on the blue conservatives for keeping FPTP voting in the states they control.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        6 days ago

        or put forward more progressive Democrats,

        Beat this drum.

        SHOW UP TO THE FUCKING PRIMARIES.

        I remember it being fucking dead in my polling place back in 2020 for the primaries compared to the general.

    • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      What’s really telling is that Democratic Party supporters seem to think that the Green Party is the only third party to exist, and that splitting the vote only affects them, when the right-wing parties and independent candidates get many, many more votes.

      • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        Weird how the Greens who get less votes than the Libertarians in every election somehow throw the vote to Republicans, when the Libertarians:

        • Are in all 50 states, the greens often are in just over half
        • More voters are registered Libertarian than any other third party since the 1980s
        • More people voted for Libertarian than Green in 2000, 2016, and 2024
        • Yet somehow Green voters are blamed in all of these despite if every Green voter was given to Democrats they wouldn’t have won, but Libertarian votes would have
        • And you never see Democrats getting mad at the serious third party that people actually vote for in swing states, but they have taken ideas from the Green party like the Green New Deal
  • jaschen@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    5 days ago

    I voted in Taiwan. I had to take a 1 hour train ride to the American embassy to vote.

  • Heyting@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    Nederlands
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    7 days ago

    Political parties are supposed to appeal to voters, not the other way around. Will post this again since people still don’t get it:

    Directing the attention towards the voters instead of the democratic party is a deliberate tactic to create division among the working class. The democratic party has way more power than your neighbour who didn’t vote. Getting angry at your neighbour will only alienate them further. It’s a waste of energy.

    • _stranger_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      This ignores a very important thing: The Republicans get their votes by lying their asses off to their base. I have no doubt the DNC has the money to pay enough people to figure out the perfect lie to tell every single person here to get their vote, but no one here wants that. Short of lies, they’d have to go with their original strategy: big tent compromise. And that’s means hard left compromising with centrists, and we all know that won’t happen.

      So what’s left? Abandon the middle? You’ll just shift the non-voting demographic around.

      Maybe if the far left could organize its own political movement, but that would require “the left” to operate as a unified group, which just by looking at all the infighting here, is obviously never going to happen.

      So we have a left that won’t compromise, a middle that isn’t big enough to win an election, and a hard right party going full send on misinformation, voter suppression, etc.

      And the largest group of eligible voters…doesn’t.

      Yeah, the answer here isn’t “the DNC changing their shit”, it’s figuring out how to get people to give a shit about voting again.

      • Heyting@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        Nederlands
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        7 days ago

        No this is all bs. Democrats abandoned it’s left-leaning voterbase by appealing to their donors and changing their campaign message from focusing on combatting wealth inequality and attacking the weird antitrans rhetoric to working together with republicans (???) and amplifying racist xenophobic rethoric more by constantly talking about how bad immigrants are. And of course not to forget their absolute refusal to end the genocide they were funding and sending Bill fucking Clinton to Michigan to berate Palestinians for caring about their families and friends being killed because they deserve it after Oct 7.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        7 days ago

        The Democrats literally campaigned with lifelong Republican leaders and doubled down on supplying a Genocide. It’s not the left that’s refusing to compromise.

        And this is all apologia for the Democrats trying to blame voters for the failure of the Democratic Party

      • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 days ago

        There’s no room for our system to allow a third party in. They’ll just be crushed by the two other parties. It’s a rigged system. Money wins. No other party will have the money to win state votes and keep them.

        • _stranger_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 days ago

          It’s not rigged, it’s just the inevitable stable state of the system. The US will have to move to a different voting system for third parties to matter.

        • illumrial@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          If you get enough actual leftist 3rd party House and congresspeople in, Dems have to make alliances with them.

          • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 days ago

            So your plan is to defeat democrats in democrat states going up against all the campaign funds that the democrats will provide to beat this third party; and then you think once they’re congress you think democrats are going to vote with them to get lefty stuff to pass that will make this new leftist party look good?

            Hey, man. I’ve got some magic beans to sell you.

            • illumrial@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              7 days ago

              False assumption to think that third party can just unseat Democrats. Also, the Dems had more money than God during the last election and couldn’t beat Trump. Also, Dems consistently neuter their own “leftist” bills (such as the green new deal) before they’re even out of committee so I don’t think they’re going to actually improve anything materially for me.

              You don’t need to use the whole magic beans sneering talk with me, dude, we probably have the same interests at heart.

        • Kalysta@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          As the republicans make it harder and harder to vote?

          Stop blaming voters and start blaming the systems of oppression that make it impossible for us to make our voices heard. How many people were purged from voter rolls in Georgia alone this election?

          • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            Problem is everyone who knew they were going to pull this shit said they would do it.

            We all said: check your registration every month, then daily a few weeks out of the election. Keep on top of that shit.

    • Lightor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      This is true, but naive. There was a choice to be made, you can argue there should be more or better choices, but there weren’t. There were two options or the option not to choose. When there’s a fork on the road you pick a way, complaining that neither path looks good doesn’t get you anywhere.

      If there’s the Party For Kicking Puppies and the Kill All Minorities Party, neither are good. But I sure as shit would would vote for the former to prevent the later. I don’t want puppies kicked, but I want minorities to live even more. Voting for neither then complaining about minorites being killed because “there was no good option” is just deflecting blame in a situation you could impact. Maybe vote in the puppy kickers and try to better it from there, because the other option doesn’t leave a lot of room.

      Yes, we should have better options. But people should also vote for the best option, because not voting is condoning the worst outcome because you felt no need to do anything to prevent it.

  • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    The voting system doesn’t have to be this way. There are many far more representative electoral systems we could use over First-past-the-post voting.

    Why aren’t the democrats doing anything? Because they don’t have to. What are you going to do, vote republican? “Vote for us… or else” is not democracy, it is a hostage situation. It is an abusive relationship.

    If the democrats supported democracy as much as they say, they would be scrambling to pass electoral reform in blue states. If democrats believed what they say about the republican party, they would not hesitate to open the voting system to 3rd parties. If it’s all about preventing republican control, it wouldn’t matter who beat the Republicans so long as they are defeated. Who could possibly say no to more then one chance to beat the Republicans?

    Here on lemmy and across the internet you should have seen many blue conservatives screaming to the heavens about the spoiler effect and how voting for 3rd parties is a vote for Trump and the republicans. This is the democratic party showing us that, yes, they do in fact understand that the voting system is a issue.

    This has happened for longer then ive been alive. So if the issue is understood, and no reform over how we vote gas taken place, then we can easily assume that the democrats prefer this voting system alongside the republicans. The democrats, don’t want you to have any options in the voting booth. The democrats want this hostage situation. The democrats prefer trump and the republicans to win over having to actually compete for your vote.

    We all understand that the republicans don’t support democracy, but now is the time to stop living in denial. The democrats also do not support democracy. They want safe states and the world’s easiest campaigns against the worst of us all. Democrats dont want to answer tough questions at debates. They want to put a party hack in front of you and laugh at your lack of an alternative. They will smash that “most important election ever” but 100 trillion times, collect checks from us and call it a day.

    Electoral reform is not some impossible dream. We control how we vote at the state level. We dont need to wait for federal reform, it could still happen before the mid terms. So we must all demand the freedom to vote how we want from both the republican and democratic party in the states that continue to use FPTP voting.

    Now is the time. No more waiting for the democrats to suddenly grow a backbone. We can choose a better way. We can have a future to look forward to. We can make the world a place people want to live in, at least more people then just the corporations and landlords that lord over us all.

    Feel free to hate me bringing this up time and again. Shut me up by passing electoral reform across the country. I know more democracy is the solution to then problems we all face. Yeah it’s a long shot. But it’s better then having no shot at all.

    Videos on Electoral Reform

    First Past The Post voting (What most states use now)

    Videos on alternative electoral systems we can try out.

    STAR voting

    Alternative vote

    Ranked Choice voting

    Range Voting

    Single Transferable Vote

    Mixed Member Proportional representation

  • VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 days ago

    I’m so tired of this. Obviously more people need to be more politically active, but there’s a lot of issues occurring that we just don’t talk about enough here.

    Being politically active while being a responsible and well-informed voter takes time. The first without the other two is just how you make more Republican voters. When you consider how much a lot of people are working and the other struggles they’re facing it really isn’t surprising that a lot of people are not that informed or active. Let’s also not pretend that one party doesn’t go out of its way to make it more difficult for people to vote either.

    Other the other side of the issue there’s a myriad of issues that have made our current democrats less motivated to be an opposition party. Also, let me just point out that a party should never sit back and watch simply because they are not currently in full control of congress at the given moment. The Republicans have led by example on this repeatedly. Even when they aren’t in control they continue to be aggressive, to be disruptive, to keep a media presence. Democrats can do this too. They need to.

    This isn’t to say that Democrats are completely to blame. There’s a lot of shitty people in this country and there are people out there that can do a bit more than what they’re doing to support the cause. This is just to say that Democrats share some responsibility and some of the burden here.

    Also I just want to put this out there. I know people are scared, people are angry, people are upset, but the blame game isn’t doing anyone any good. It is important to understand what went wrong, but spending all our time pointing fingers is simply wasting energy.

  • ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 days ago

    Well the Google results i saw say about 64% of eligible voters voted, which is apparently high for the US.

    Based on 2020 numbers it does look like a lot of 2020 Biden voters stayed home and most 2020 Trump voters came out again. Add in some economy frustration and surprise we get this shit show for 4 years…

  • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    The dems failed to convince enough people to vote for them. The largest share of votes in the last election was for no-one. Your primary job as a political party is to convince people to vote for you. if they can’t get people motivated in the face of bare faced fascism then they need to take a serious look at why their policies do not speak to americans.

    Very few people who voted for Kamala were voting FOR Kamala… they were voting AGAINST Trump

  • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    7 days ago

    Second highest voter turn out for a presidential election in US history.

    Clearly its the voters fault…

    Also why in the broken nation is the assumption that if more people showed up they would have voted like you? I never got this concept. Please spend more effort being an opposition/resistance and less being poor losers.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      7 days ago

      Millions of people who voted for Biden in 2020 didn’t show up to vote for Harris in 2024.

      Trump’s numbers barely changed at all between the two.

      • lemminator@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        And I can’t say that I blame them. Biden’s presidency… or his campaign… or Harris’ campaign…

        It was a shit-show all the way through. Maybe next time the Democrats should try catering to their voter base.

        • PugJesus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 days ago

          And I can’t say that I blame them.

          “I know fascism is bad, but I understand allowing it - I mean, look how uninspired the other option was!”

          Yeah, this is exactly why we’re in this position.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          14 Million primary voters picked Biden in 2024.

          He won the primary, as has every incumbent for many many decades.

          We failed them, not the other way around.

          • Kalysta@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            6 days ago

            What primary? The democrats did everything they could to shut down primaries. From refusing to run other candidates to outright cancelling votes.

          • lemminator@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            A rigged primary, where the voters weren’t really given a choice. Voters were very vocal that they didn’t want him to run again, and the leadership openly ignored them. Next time, maybe the leadership should listen to the base that they claim they represent.

            • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 days ago

              If he was winning primaries with 90% then clearly voters weren’t vocal about that at all. The vocals ones we saw in media didn’t properly represent the voters.

              But when statistics showed Kamala Harris had a better chance at victory, he did drop out and gave his ticket, that he won fairly in a Primary Election, to her, his vice president.

              • lemminator@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                6 days ago

                Voters were saying it very loudly, the Democratic leadership just ignored them. Polls were very clear that nobody wanted either of them to run, and they both had a low approval ratings. The ticket wasn’t his to give, it was up to the voters. The Democrats chose to skip the voters, so the voters abandoned them.

                I don’t see why anyone would expect voters to stick with a party that treats it’s base so disrespectfully.

            • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              I still think there’s a good chance he could have won it the second time because there are enough sexist and racist democrats who stayed home who could have made a difference.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        I hate the us government as much as the next invasion target, but this stupid tribalism has gotten out of hand. Was this the inevitable result of a two party system (a joke pretending to be a democracy)? Maybe, but the very idea that I am expected to “pick a side” even as a outsider and that once I do half of the us will write me off is laughable.

        America, you did this. Stop trying to make it someone else’s fault.

        If we are to assume that there was voting suppression, do something about it!

        If we are to assume that there was voting fraud, do something about it!

        If we are to assume that the majority of americans did not want the current administration, then do something about it!

        This should be a no brainier if you have the majority of americans against this then you should have the will and ability to do something about it.
        But you clearly don’t have the majority of your nations people behind you in this, most likely don’t care enough (a side effect of that two party system) or and this might shock you, that the majority of americans are really just that awful and want to watch the free world burn.

    • skaarl@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 days ago

      It is pathetic that among high voter suppression (due to Republican motions) the Democrats blame the people for not voting, instead of blaming voter suppression, or any of the other decades worth of inaction by Democrats to foresee and prepare for this. They have a two party system, it’s not like the Republicans were a complete surprise

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        Its just wild looking into this from outside. If the election was rigged, then it would have fallen on the party that was in power at the time to manage right? Well what side of the two party system was in then? After so many years watching the US ratchet more and more into crazy town I just can not understand how people can not put blame on one half of what is no longer a democracy (maybe a Diarchy?).

        Then there is the assumption that if more people showed up to vote the results would change. This seems to make the assumption that the democrats are the default choice (even if the lesser evil, making the concept of choice a joke) and that the people who are clearly angry, burnt out and did not think they mattered would not want to see the world burn.

        • PugJesus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          and that the people who are clearly angry, burnt out and did not think they mattered would not want to see the world burn.

          Well, then they can see the world burn. Surely there’s no reason to complain - this is what they wanted.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Why did you cut out the VEP? The very next column…

        it stands for Voting Eligible Population by the way.

        Edit, for those not willing to click a link here is the picture not cut off:

        Notice how there are 3 measurements of voter turn out? Two of which show this to have been the second highest turn out? Now does this show a larger then there should be level of disenfranchisement? Yes, so fix that!

        • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          7 days ago

          I cut off the VEP because I mistook the voting age population for the voting eligible population and now that you pointed that out (thank you by the way) I’m looking into why there’s such a difference between those two numbers.

          • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            7 days ago

            Its people that have lost the right/ability to vote. Most likely due to the terrible american for profit prison system.

              • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                7 days ago

                It was not included before it was invented, it was also not needed as the level of voter disenfranchisement was not yet an issue. It is now the standard metric (since you guys have so many people that are barred from voting).