• Cannibal_MoshpitV3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Humans have the highest capacity for endurance and for a very long time we hunted not by being smarter but by literally following animals until they got tired and gave up before we did.

    • nixcamic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      11 months ago

      I believe certain breeds of dogs and horses can keep up with us, but only because we bred them to.

    • 0ops@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      11 months ago

      To follow an animal often required tracking it when it ran out of sight. Our sense of smell stinks, so we looked for clues on where it went. That’s smart

      • Patapon Enjoyer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        Our sense of smell isn’t bad. We’re great at detecting minute variations in smells as well as detecting rotting things in very little quantity.

        • 0ops@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yeah, you’re right. I should have said that our sense of smell isn’t specialized for smelling other animals at a distance for tracking like many other animals can.

    • ssboomman@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      That, plus we are good at throwing things and we sweat. Which means we have range and we can cool off while still being active.

      • Hyperreality@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        The thing with a lot of animals is also that they’re pretty dumb.

        They could potentially out walk us, it’s the most energy efficient way of moving, but what they actually do is run off when they see a human, then when they no longer see the human, they take a break. At which point the human catches up. At which point they run off again. Repeat multiple times.

        The human simply has to keep walking, while the animal keeps running off. If the animal instead walked, the human would never or take far longer to catch up, because the animal would tire itself far less.