Even if the punishment were death, the average fucking citizen is not goddamn judge jury and executioner.
The toxicology PROVED he was NOT under the influence, which is a perfect example of WHY vigilante murder is unacceptable. Innocent until proven guilty, you piece of shit.
no one was arguing that but im glad you kept your whore mouth civil at the end there. takes a monster to call one out. You Even Larger Piece of shit. 🤡🤣
I believe it has to do with the weights of the punishments.
Although, I will remain neutral in the argument. Drunk driving has the high chance for manslaughter, so could be considered equivalent to attempting murder. However, murder is murder, and should have a larger punishment than chance of murder.
Of course, in the grand scheme of things, we have no way of preventing the drunk driver’s death because it was “more of a punishment”, for the obvious reason that it already happened.
In other words, a dickhead is dead and there’s no changing it, so no need to argue about “it not being equal”
The penalty for drunk driving is death.
The penalty for murder is prison.
You seem ok with this setup.
what do you have issues with? i presume this from your final statement.
please elaborate?
Are you saying Drunk Driving is okay in any way shape, form or fashion?
Murder shouldn’t be punished with Prison time?
I’m not sure where our disconnect is.
I’m just pointing out that you seem happy that drink driving has a more serious punishment than murder.
Stop giving this cunt attention.
I’m sorry that you find the internet a terrible place where you have no control. it must be alienating. did you want to discuss it?
what should be the penalty for drunk driving?
Less than the penalty for murder. More than the penalty for shop lifting. Maybe exactly the same as the penalty for reckless endangerment.
But I can say with certainty that being shot without a trial is not an acceptable penalty.
Even if the punishment were death, the average fucking citizen is not goddamn judge jury and executioner.
The toxicology PROVED he was NOT under the influence, which is a perfect example of WHY vigilante murder is unacceptable. Innocent until proven guilty, you piece of shit.
no one was arguing that but im glad you kept your whore mouth civil at the end there. takes a monster to call one out. You Even Larger Piece of shit. 🤡🤣
Fades. you seem distraught. talk to me cupcake. what’s on your mind?
Gd you’re such a tool.
If i’m a tool, what do you call the person who keeps racking the pins up for me to knock them down?
Wire Stripper? Crescent Wrench? If i’m going to be called a black kettle from the black pot, lets get our labels right.
You can be, Captain indignant.
what did you want our team’s motto to be?
but she did judge, jury and execute him
and she was an average citizen.
hm…reality vs what should be
Yes, and now she’s going to jail for it because that’s not ok. Hmm, reality vs your stupid fantasy
Dude stop feeding this troll. That dude is mentally unwell.
:D
what fantasy did i have? what reality do you think I’m missing. you should re check all the replies. you are lost mate.
I believe it has to do with the weights of the punishments.
Although, I will remain neutral in the argument. Drunk driving has the high chance for manslaughter, so could be considered equivalent to attempting murder. However, murder is murder, and should have a larger punishment than chance of murder.
Of course, in the grand scheme of things, we have no way of preventing the drunk driver’s death because it was “more of a punishment”, for the obvious reason that it already happened.
In other words, a dickhead is dead and there’s no changing it, so no need to argue about “it not being equal”