• Wahots@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    218
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is literally why we have apex predators such as wolves. They help clamp down on the old and the sick so that prions (mad cow disease) does not spread to other species or humans. It cannot infect wolves.

    When you kill off all the apex predators, like when Montana governor Greg Gianforte authorized the massacre of 100 wolves, you see explosions of extremely dangerous diseases and land degradation as deer damage tree roots, gardens, meadows, streams, and farms.

    Not only that, but killing members of wolf packs causes their families to fall apart and everyone to scatter. That means wolves alone. Which cannot hunt pack animals which require coordination. So then they go after the easiest meal: dumbass farm animals who have zero survival instincts and whose ranchers no longer employ people to look after the herds in great enough numbers like the olden days. The cycle then perpetuates, as mad-cow contaminated soils spread and spread…

      • rosymind@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        The more we learn, the better it will be for all species. We’ll figure it out eventually… or die out

          • rosymind@leminal.space
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            Could be! I’ve spent the last 3 or so years with little to do but think, read, argue and watch youtube. I tend to watch mostly educational content, ranging from the big ones (“nile red”, “veritasium”, nutshell I can’t spell, “world science festival”) to lesser known ones (“sci-show”, “fall of civilizations”, “economics explained”, “donna” and a bunch of others). Robert Sapolsky is amazing, btw, look him up if you don’t already know who he is. But anyway, most recently I learned about the last 5 mass extinctions in a video by “paleo analysis”

            Anyway…

            I think many people will die in the upcoming climate crisis (and are already dying) but I don’t think humanity itself will completely die out. I mean, we are not the pinnacle of evolution that some people would like to think, and we’re still changing and likely will continue to do so as our environment changes. But die out completely? Prrrrrobably not. As a species we’re highly adaptive (even though some idiots in power hold us back) and I think that at least enough of us will survive to continue the species.

            Maybe not, but I think we have a shot that’s no more unlikely than anything else that’s happened so far

            • SendMePhotos@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              I think you’re right. Having assets spread across different investments protects one from going bankrupt. Having our species spread across the different climates means that we may still survive but probably not most of us.

                • SendMePhotos@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I just hope that the species can progress instead of regress. I feel like we’ve had severe regression in the last 25-35 years.

                  • rosymind@leminal.space
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I totally get what you mean. I’m hopeful, tho. Pressures force growth and adaptation. I think we’re still in the complacent zone. I’m interested to see what happens next

            • force@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I wouldn’t call economics explained or sci-show “lesser-known”, they’re some of the most popular “educational” youtubers out there now… (although a lot of the times i would find it more accurate to call economics explained videos opinion pieces based on faulty claims/sources rather than educational videos)

              • rosymind@leminal.space
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Which would you recommend? I don’t mind dry, but I have issues with accents. I like Anton Petrov’s videos but I find it difficult to understand him (as an example)

      • doppelgangmember@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Eh, beg to differ. It’s our industrialist society imo.

        Native Americans were shown to actually improve the ecosystems they inhabited through permaculture. We’re not doing the same practices like we should nowadays.

    • otterpop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can’t infect wolves? I’m no expert here but I don’t feel like a vertebrate mammal with a brain could be completely immune to prions. Do you have any more information on that claim?

      • Wahots@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        54
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s in the OP article. They haven’t found any infections yet, and it doesn’t appear to affect them. Apex predators have, prior to human intervention, always hunted the old, the young, and the sick. Mother nature appears to have found a way around apex predators all dying from disease to balance the environment.

        • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Afaik it’s because they naturally die before the disease becomes crippling. Or it becomes crippling around or after the normal lifespan of the animal. It doesn’t mean they aren’t affected, it means it doesn’t affect them before they would normally die…

          Please don’t anthropomorphize “mother nature”. Mother nature doesn’t think, or make decisions, it is a natural progression of life and death… There is a process and a cycle to much of it, hand waving “mother nature finds a way” ignores and dismisses the reality of it, and excludes the science that helps us understand how our world actually works.

          • evranch@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            I believe canines were found to be resistant to prion diseases, as they evolved to eat all manner of sick, dying and dead animals. Likely something to do with digestion, gut barrier or blood-brain barrier. Canines are pretty unique in their ability to eat almost anything that was once alive without getting sick.

            CWD is a very fast acting disease compared to most prison diseases, and should easily become visible during the lifespan of a dog or wolf.

            • Wahots@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              Scavengers like Hyenas and Vultures too. Vultures even have some strange adaptations to take care of their feet when feasting on scavenged carcasses. Their GI tracts are wild.

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can’t… Infect… Wolves?

      You do know that prions aren’t living things right? They don’t “infect”, they are a physical change to a compound (protein) that spreads to other similar compounds it touches. It’s not a virus, or a bacteria.

      Unless wolves lack the same proteins that deer also have? Usually this is a mammal thing, not a species thing.