It’s time to be honest about Musk’s vacuum tube to nowhere

  • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    11 months ago

    A very long evacuated tube hundreds or thousands of miles long - too long to ever be actively defended - is itself fundamentally untenable. There are US states where every “welcome to ___” sign is shot up with holes. You don’t think people will take potshots at this thing?

    Even if you somehow made it armoured and immune to small arms (this would be the largest armoured thing ever constructed), it would never make any sense over cutting edge high speed rail that doesn’t require an evacuated tube.

    This all comes straight from first principles. To change this, any number of fantastical technologies would need to be invented (maybe the tube can be made of vibranium?).

    • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      11 months ago

      What I always thought was the worst part about the idea is pressure equalization in the event of an eventual cabin seal failure.

      • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah I think we’ve learned all we need to know about the mega-rich “MoVe FaSt AnD bReAk ThiNgS” types and their highly pressurized people-carrying cylinders…

          • scutiger@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            11 months ago

            So the pressure difference between the vehicle and the outside is the opposite. If the vehicle fails, rather than being crushed by the pressure, the occupants explode.

      • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah, that’s why we don’t have any thousands mile long tubes transporting dangerous substances.

        None of those are vacuum tubes. This is nonsense.

        What happens when someone shoots a gun at them?

        They leak. Literally all the time. They keep working. This won’t.

        I think it was a good thing to try.

        Okay well you got there eventually.

      • sir_reginald@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’m just saying that some guy commenting on a blog is not a good reason not to try.

        The good reason not to try is that bullet trains have proved working perfectly in other parts of the world. Sure, they would be slower than an hypothetical hyperloop but they are a working technology that would help alleviate the transportation problem.

        Why invest in a project that might lead nowhere?

        I’m not anti experimentation, by any means. It’s just that as the article says, the hyperloop was proposed when a bullet train was being discussed by local politicians.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      You don’t think people will take potshots at this thing?

      Given that I always heard it being envisioned that the evacuated tube would be a tunnel, no, I don’t.

      • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Just I’m clear on this the plan is/was to dig a large diameter tunnel underground, between cities?

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          As far as I know, yep. That’s how “The Boring Company” fit in to the scheme.